Hillary cannot lead her own life and she will not lead this country in a positive direction.
Bill Clinton skrewed her and now she want's to skrew us.
There is nothing patriotic about a user and a liar. America needs a leader we can place our trust.
It was Bill Clinton that signed NAFTA and the following year embraced the WTO and since '94 the impact on the "american workers economy" has suffered greatly while the corporations enjoy million and billion dollar profits.
Hillary couldn't lead when it was time to vote on the war. Hillary wouldn't even READ the necessary papers to make a competent decision, but when she wants to "change" her mind, guess what, Hillary blames everybody else except for her own actions.
As a senator, all senators, Its a good idea to read the legislation before you pass it and last but not least, 3,500 soldiers are dead because Hillary could not LEAD and actually read vital information.
If anyone votes democrat at least vote for Barack or Dennis, at least they don't have blood on their hands as to the Iraq war.
2007-06-11 12:12:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by psssst 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
hey, when did you get so political?
You know i dont like hil, but no-one can accuse her of being incompetent or a bad senator. With or without her husband, she would have gotten her job, her own family has enough connections and she was a brilliant student. She is hard working and nobody can prove otherwise. I dont like her because she always sounds acrimonious and her ideas are too liberal for me and the husband issue, but she's not stupid and she could run a country, just not the way i want her too.
And your other question about the US becoming a third world country and all? You are wrong, yes the economy is staggering right now, but nothing else is expected in a time of war and its nowhere as drastic as turning the US into a third world country. And we have both read enough history to know that America has been through so much worse and emerged through a crisis as a force to be reckoned with (ex. Great Depression).
So you think the poor are getting poorer and the rich are getting richer? Ask yourself how people acquire money, for most of us, its through hard work. If the rich are getting richer they deserve it, they have that right because they have worked for it. The poor are getting poorer? We pay taxes every year, they get housing, food and college admission is a breeze if any of those kids have put a bit of effort, they can't say there is no way of getting education, they can get it for free if they take the time to apply. They have every oppurtunity to better themselves, its not unfair.
Where are your jobs going to?
Outsourcing isn't as big a deal as they make it and you have enough jobs for yourself. New jobs are created every year.
So take a deep breath, you can run to Australia if you want to, but your country is in no real danger.
And this for the silly Lisa girl who thinks that having a woman pres is going to make US look weaker: If you have any idea about world matters, the few but great women leaders, have been looked upon with respect. In the world's playground there is no double standard. Ever heard of Margaret Thatcher and Indira Gandhi? Its because of people like you that girls get discouraged.
2007-06-12 22:34:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by crank 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
First off, lets clear something up. Hillary does not belong in the Senate..secondly, she does not belong in the senate as a senator of New York.
She gained her senate seat because she was the wife of a former president and appeased the upstate New Yorkers who knew not of any other candidate.
Next, Clinton has done nothing note worthy while she has been in the senate.
Clinton did not divorce her husband for 2 reasons...1) It brought her into the public eye. 2) It made her look like a martyr.
She didn't divorce her husband because if she did, she would look like every other woman in the US, but no she had to stand out among the others to show that she is "stronger".
Did you know that Hillary was born in Arkansas? Did you know that if she ran for senator in Arkansas she would have never even come close to winning, and so what did she do...she moved to New York where she would play up to the liberal media.
2007-06-11 11:45:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Joseph P 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
I have seen this question about twenty times and it gets more stupid every time I see it. I am not a Hillary Clinton Fan, but the fact that she did or didn't leave her husband should not be a n issue. Do you look up to Guliani? He left two wives, one of which was his cousin. What a great guy.
2007-06-11 11:40:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
0⤋
For those WHO actually think it would be a "Good Thing" to have Hillary Clinton as president you really need to think it over. The United States is the ONLY Super Powered Nation, once a woman is elected other Countries will see the USA as a Country they can run over. As far as her not leaving her husband I tend to agree on that as well, she has stayed for her OWN interests!!!! As a Tax Payer, I would be furious is she was elected as President and I would be very concerned for our National Safety.......As far as the Republican and or Democratic ticket I couldn't care a less. I would vote for the person who has the Best Interests of this Country on their mind, a strong woman to be first lady who actually can stand behind her man and a family that doesn't buy it's way into the WHITE HOUSE......
2007-06-11 11:45:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mona Lisa 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
Shriner... the fist concept I had grew to become into "oh turn on the tears to attraction to in the help" (because of fact of those days being down in the polls), yet after analyzing and staring on the clip... IF, innovations you, IF she isn't enjoying a pastime... she is in basic terms being passionate, no longer susceptible as you remarked. You cant anticipate a similar-o-same out of a girl Presidential Candidate... the two sexes are diverse, equivalent yet diverse. jmho EDIT: <3 ... you basically upload to the sentiment that girls are susceptible minded with your unwell witted commentary... a girl president couldnt probably be as detrimental to our us of a because of fact the present one has been!
2016-10-09 00:26:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
How many times do we need to be bombarded with these right wing supposition posts and personal attacks before people stop paying attention?
I don't particularly care for the woman, but this post is just more of the same old reactionary garbage.
Peace
2007-06-11 11:49:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
How many people can "lead" their own lives? George W. Bush was a drunk and drug addict for many years. Does that mean he couldn't lead in his own life, much less a nation? (Hmmmm...) It sort of comes down to a story in the Bible where Jesus tells the angry mob to stone the prostitute, but only if he had no sin in his own life. It sounds like your anger goes deeper than your dislike for Senator Clinton. Perhaps, you've had a "man" do you wrong recently.
Are you ready for change? Hillary 2008
2007-06-11 11:41:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jackson Leslie 5
·
2⤊
5⤋
I've been asking myself this same question for years. The only reason she didn't divorce him was for her own political gain. Any reasonable woman would have kicked the lying bag of garbage to the curb and walked out..........but not Hillary. She is using him for political gain.
2007-06-11 11:44:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
I think she can lead her own life.
some people do have bad personal lives but are grate with their professional lives.
you have no idea why she didn't leave him. maybe she forgave him, maybe she loves him, maybe she is staying for her daughter's sake, ect
no one can comment on her reasons except her
2007-06-11 11:52:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋