i bought a product that claimed to be a sunblock, used it 4 times during a 5 1/2 hr time period at a waterpark according to directions on label. long story short my little bro recieved 2nd degree sunburn i have been looking for reviews on this product and stumbled across a few pages that list the criteria for sunblock vs sunscreen appearantly to be considered a sunblock a product has to contain a physical barrier such as zinc oxide or titanium dioxide, this product does not, yet on the label it says sunblock, not sunscreen, it is an spf 50 waterproof, product for kids my bro had to see a dr to be treated for this and is in a lot of pain any suggestions for what we can do?
2007-06-11
11:25:23
·
4 answers
·
asked by
aarika
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
to ph he most certainly did need to see a dr he had second degree burns with blisters the size of dimes it was reapplied several times during the day
2007-06-11
11:39:38 ·
update #1
a sunblock MUST contain a physical block from the sun a sunscreen does not have to meet this requirement this product says its a sunblock
2007-06-11
11:50:37 ·
update #2
well in spite of what the aad page says this product is clearly labeled to be a sunblock i guess they arent keeping up with the latest health info huh and to think that they are one of the biggest makers of sun protection in the us
2007-06-11
13:00:24 ·
update #3
conveniently enough a different brand was used on our faces and no burns were recieved there
2007-06-11
13:05:05 ·
update #4
either way a product with an spf of 50 applied often throughout the day on a child who was then made to wait for a half an hour before returning to the water should have better results than this even his pediatrician said that the burn would have been similar for this time period without sunblock so there was virtually no protection on a product with a 50 spf
2007-06-11
13:15:58 ·
update #5