English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

So why doesn't the independent candidate get more votes in the presidential election

2007-06-11 11:19:57 · 11 answers · asked by Fishy5499 1 in Politics & Government Elections

11 answers

cnn is the problem they will say anything true or not mostly not

2007-06-11 11:25:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think that most voters are in the middle between both parties. While the candidates are often closer to the party line, the voters still have to select between the two parties. Independent candidates do not have the money, people, or visibility to run an effective campaign. It is impossible in some states to get on the ballot. Other states make it difficult to get on the ballot.
There is an organization this election that is trying to build momentum to give the independents a voice in the election. It may or may not succeed depending on whether they can motivate that independent group. It is www.unity08.com. Look at it and you see some interest. They are far from being a strong enough power to make a difference - YET.

2007-06-13 03:49:14 · answer #2 · answered by ustoev 6 · 0 0

I registered as an Independent here in CA. Independent only means that you are not registered with either one party or the other, it does not determine how you will vote.

There are usually no good Independent candidates good enough to advance. A candidate who is Independent is usually liberal.

I am independent so I can vote in any primary I want. I intend to vote in the Democrat Primary because the Democrats have the power in CA, but I will vote Republican in the general election when it counts the most.

2007-06-11 12:40:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Indepent means that a person is not a slave to the propaganda of the Republican or the Democratic pary. It means they don't vote the way the party wants, but the way THEY want. They are more prepared, know the candidates better, spend more time researching each candidate, listening to everyones point of view... In other words, they are smart enough to make their own decision about the candidates and the issues and don't look to someone else to tell them what they should think or how they should vote.

By the way, they are usually smarter - and right.

2007-06-11 11:38:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There is not 'Independent' candidate. There are a multitude of thrid-party candidates who get virtually no votes.

Those who identify as 'Independent' merely disagree with both the Democrats and Republicans to enough of an extent that they can't stand to identify with either. That doesn't mean they agree with eachother, at all.

2007-06-11 11:26:29 · answer #5 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0 0

Because all the campaign money goes to Dem or Rep. candidates.

Not to mention name-brand recognition, nobody knows who the independent candidates really are.

For the independent movement to grow, a major political player needs to jump ship and come over. However, all the mainstream candidates are afraid of losing donations, so they won't.

2007-06-11 11:27:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

He has the final ti burn the books and Westboro baptist church has the final to protest funerals. on the different hand, I certainly have the final to call the guy on the Florida church a pathetic excuse for someone an a pastor. the place did the ridiculous thought upward thrust up that somebody won't be in a position to help loose speech whilst on the same time speaking out while somebody says something they locate disgusting? the guy in Florida has his rights. he's likewise nonetheless a depressing bastard. on the same time, you have an legal accountability, once you pay attention good wing pundits spout their rubbish and misrepresentations and spin approximately something and each little thing to do with the Obama administration, to study the info for your self. Your reflexive anti Muslim/Obama rhetoric shows which you have no longer accomplished that.

2016-12-12 18:22:32 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

What they are doing is pointing out that more voters are not going to continue voting for a straight party ticket. They are going to vote for the best candidate. We can say this is one thing good that Bush actually acomplished.

2007-06-11 11:26:48 · answer #8 · answered by Enigma 6 · 0 0

I believe that many people don't want to box themselves in as Democrats or Republicans However, people generally vote for someone who they believe has a chance at winning, unless they choose to make a protest vote.

2007-06-11 11:28:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You heard this? On the radio? Is there an article on CNN's webpage because I couldn't find anything.

2007-06-11 13:28:53 · answer #10 · answered by Specialist McKay 4 · 0 0

this is most likely true. i know on yahoo chat they say they are independent because they are tired of getting bashed because they support either repubs or dems.

2007-06-11 11:30:01 · answer #11 · answered by caroline k 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers