English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

27 answers

Honestly I am not a big fan. Not allowing the fertilized egg to attached is tantamount to killing it. That said it is probably preferable to ripping a fetus apart limb by limb later on in it's development.

2007-06-11 09:48:56 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 12 7

i think of you're puzzling emergency contraceptive pills (additionally observed as "morning after pills") with the abortion pill (additionally observed as RU-486). Plan B pills are emergency contraceptive pills no longer the abortion pill. Researchers have pointed out numerous strategies that the morning after pills probably preclude being pregnant and that they gained't reason an abortion. If somebody is against ABORTION yet no longer against use of start administration, then they does no longer (if knowledgeable on the issue) be detrimental to the morning after pills. Emergency contraceptive pills artwork in lots a similar way as in many cases happening start administration pills yet shouldn’t be depended on as a favourite sort of start administration. Emergency contraceptive pills can preclude or delay ovulation (the time in the girl’s cycle while her ovaries launch an egg) or if taken earlier fertilization (the factor while the egg and sperm meet), they could intervene with the technique of fertilizing the egg, case in point making it greater durable for the egg or the sperm to commute (and meet up) in the reproductive tract. The abortion pill, Mifepristone, that's bought interior united states of america of america under the type call Mifeprex, belongs to a clean classification of medicine popular as antiprogestins, which end the form of a being pregnant as quickly because it has began (which occurs as quickly as a fertilized egg implants in the uterus).

2016-10-09 00:14:46 · answer #2 · answered by stanaland 4 · 0 0

I think that, once the sperm and egg create unique DNA, the mother should not be allowed to end it's life.

However, although I am personally against birth control, it should be a frequently-used last resort for people who can't keep their clothes on.


---Sorry, I was mistaken. I thought the morning-after pill destroyed the egg after implantation. However, it merely prevents implantation. That being said, since the sperm has not yet joined with the egg, the mother should still be allowed to prevent the act. I am OK with the morning after pill, because it destroys an egg that is still part of the mother, as opposed to a singular human being.

2007-06-11 10:14:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

I am not anti-abortionist, but I personally don't see anything wrong with the morning after pill! *sm*

2007-06-11 12:46:24 · answer #4 · answered by LadyZania 7 · 0 2

In the absence of responsible behavior, I am okay with the use of the morning after pill. The zygote is far from a living being . . .

If I had my d'ruthers, I'd pound abstinence into the heads of people. Sex ed isn't getting us very far, because 1) birth control is not fully effective, 2) they are not just teaching prevention, but encouraging indiscriminate sex as okay and "natural."

2007-06-11 10:23:50 · answer #5 · answered by Moneta_Lucina 4 · 1 2

My stance is that it prevents the egg from being implanted. It doesn't take a life. It stops it from becoming life. I am not opposed to it.

It is a contraceptive. One should consider using birth control BEFORE the act, not after though.

2007-06-11 09:55:44 · answer #6 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 3 1

It is a much better choice than abortion since it prevents implantation in the first place. Many fertilized eggs don't implant naturally--so I don't feel it is much different than using birth control-albeit riskier than practicing safe sex in the first place. I feel it is a very practical "choice" for women who've been raped. At least this way, they never become pregnant and have to deal with 'choice' if the rape results in pregnancy.

2007-06-11 09:53:48 · answer #7 · answered by Cherie 6 · 5 0

Why should you have to take the morning after pill. A condom costs about $1. Birth control pills can be taken. Both proven to prevent pregnancies.

If someone is raped, yes they should be allowed to take the pill.

2007-06-11 09:50:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 8 2

What is wrong with using a condom that protects against AID's, STD's, and pregnancy?

If you don't want a baby then use birth control (condoms and birth control pills) or keep your legs shut. End of story.

2007-06-11 10:42:14 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 3 1

Morning after pill? Why not use a condom the night before?

2007-06-11 09:59:41 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 1 2

Interesting question. Doesn't a pro-life proponent believe that life starts at conception, and if that's true then isn't the morning after pill abortion at the earliest term?

2007-06-11 09:50:31 · answer #11 · answered by Big Dave 4 · 8 2

fedest.com, questions and answers