N.P.R. Radio says man has been kept in solitary confinement since 2001 without ever being charged in Alabama Prison. Court orders BUSH to charge him or release him, and that his Constitutional Rights have been Violated... He was never charged, but was only being held on suspicion of Terrorism...
2007-06-11 09:29:31 · 8 answers · asked by dca2003311@yahoo.com 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Well, Bush is the Decider. He alone can Decide whether or not he wants to follow the Constitution. He alone can Decide whether he wants to listen to Congress. Or the American people. Or he can just Decide to tell all of us to go f*ck ourselves because he's the Decider.
Bush is a criminal who has violated his oath of office countless times. He should be impeached, then imprisoned.
2007-06-11 09:41:28 · answer #1 · answered by wineboy 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I find this unlikely for a number of reasons.
First of all, attempts to verify NPR stories in the past reveal that they often report rumors and opinion as settled fact. Some of their "facts" turn out to be fabrications when the issue is Environmental. They're a dubious source.
Second, noone was arrested for terrorism before 9/11/01. Guantanamo was not only empty, it wasn't even a confinement facility. I doubt anyone arrested during 2001 for Terrorism was left in CONUS, because there was a LOT of space in Gitmo.
Third.... Alabama? Does that not make you just a WEE bit suspicious?
My thoughts are that it's typical NPR reporting. All mud and no traction.
You people that apparently believe this enough to be calling for impeachment on it are idiots. I mean that in the nicest way possible, but you have absolutely no evidence that it happened, let alone a scintilla of proof that Bush personally has scienter. I suggest you get a Magic 8 Ball and let that do your thinking for you from now on, I'm sure you'll see a positive difference in your lives from doing it yourself.
2007-06-11 09:40:18 · answer #2 · answered by open4one 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
If that man is not a U.S. citizen, then no. He didn't violate the constitution. If he is a U.S. citizen then he is due a speedy trial. President Bush doesn't imprison people, he can't even hold people, that is up to the local authorities. Bush has no say.
2007-06-11 09:34:47 · answer #3 · answered by Brian s 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Vote,protest,(peacefully) petition the court.
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/loving.html
Loving case,decided
http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/us_law/inthecourts/supreme_court_al_marri.htm
Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri, Qatari student
Pending
2007-06-11 09:45:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You gotta be kidding! Bush couldn't hold you on contempt! He is not a prosecutor, he is a President! Now if you want to ask if some one in the administration violated this guys rights, you might have something.
2007-06-11 09:35:49 · answer #5 · answered by T C 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yes, it does appear that he has violated the constitution. That sir is an impeachable offense.
2007-06-11 09:43:29 · answer #6 · answered by Kerry R 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes. I'll hold him down, you kick his teeth in. Meet in front of the white house at dawn...but keep it on the down low
2007-06-11 09:58:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You believe NPR radio????
HA, HA, HA!!!!
And you think Fox News spins the stories. I think Al Jazeera has fairer news stories that NPR.
2007-06-11 09:32:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋