Why do people get angry at GWB.?

Question

When our soldiers die, and not angry enough at the people killing our soldiers to get behind America's efforts. I don't want to hear Bush lied and all of that crap. If he lied bring forth the evidence, and I'll be the first in line to impeach him. Americans want to put the blame on America, and not blame the ones actually killing our troops. Whether or not we are there for reasons you like or don't, point is we are there, Congress and this administration are not pulling them out anytime soon, so why not be pissed at the people killing them while they are there. They are Jihadist. We have a clear enemy, much like the Japanese, Germans, Viet Cong, N. Koreans. Go guys and gals in our countries battles, may your bullets fly true.

Answer 1

Well said.

Answer 2

Use some common sense here, dude. Your argument makes no sense. We could be freakin' in Canada killing people, and would the "we're there, so deal with it" argument be valid then? Of course not. Our troops would not be being killed in Iraq if they were not there. Period. Meanwhile, thousands of innocent Iraqis have died so we can supposedly protect ourselves from terrorists that were not even there before we went, and we've all but forgotten Afghanistan and Osama bin Laden, the people responsible for 9/11. So why are we there, then? The jihadists were not even in Iraq until we started the war. Even Bush has admitted this. He has even admitted that there are no WMDs there, which is the reason he gave for going in the first place. You're own guy has admitted it! The "Bush lied and all of that crap" comment is just ignorant. Bring forth the evidence? Why? You can go online and find constant examples of clips of Bush contradicting himself, and you'll still deny it. You've got your position, and you're putting the blinders on. So why should I even try? Your analogies are bad. Your argument is illogical. You're wrong. There's no reason to reason with you.

Answer 3

Boy, you must be a special kind of stupid not to know that there is plenty of evidence supporting that Bush has lied numerous times to the American people. Dismissing his lies, shows me that you are a kool aid drinker.

You should pull your head out of the Fox news channel and read all of the articles that state overwhelming evidence.

Most people with a functional thought process that know enough about the issues, will poise their anger towards the people that acutally got us into this mess in the first place.

I put the blame on the bush administration, Al Quada, Osama Bin Laden, Afghanistan and the terrorists that came from the UAE. I don't put my blame on Iraqi civilians that had nothing to do with 9-11.

Answer 4

Not my enemy. They never did a damn thing to me. And as for a clear enemy, last time I checked the so called "Terrorists" didn't have uniforms on. So that's just an assumption.

And Bush and his administration are the ones who sent the troops to Iraq. So why not blame him.

"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government" - Edward Abbey

Answer 5

I want to be the first in line for impeachment. Start with the Downing Street memos and go on to sooo much more documentation of the Dumbya lies. I want someone to document a TRUTHFUL statement by Dumbya. THAT would be difficult for anything more important than what the weather was on a given day.

Answer 6

You complete bellend. LOL. Who is is the next retard you are going to prop up when your beloved George Bush is gone in a year or so? People like you are just plain wrong I couldn't put it any simpler than that. You are defending a lying pipedream. He won't be around for ever. Then what will fools like you do with their lives? The worst thing about your type is you would rather support a lying politician for 8 years, than millions of your own fellow countrymen and women. George Bush supporters are a weird breed they see things in a very blinkered way and feel compelled to agree with everything the man says or does. But like I said he won't be around forever.

Answer 7

It's true that we should not get lost behind a divide that argues as to whether or not Bush has lied. However, let us not swing the pendulum so far to the other extreme and forget that we should be concerned with leaders who 'lead', for surely, the one who leads, has the power to lead into hell. I would advise that you do some in-depth research on what it means to be a good leader and what it means to misuse power. From the very beginning after September 11, 2001, George W. Bush and various others, hid behind the tragedy itself and those who supported him. In a time of such vulnerability, a good leader would have never told his people that they were either with him or with the terrorists without at the very LEAST, offering those who had questions for the sake of the dead, answers to prove himself as a leader. In the aftermath of 9/11, I quickly took notice of a leader who quickly seemed to be forgetting the dead more than I appreciated. I still resent him for this. His honor for them was displaced. He was quick to make his calls, and grant it, under such circumstances, this is understandable. On this notion alone, it is a sure sign of a leader taking charge. However, such 'forging ahead' as a leader ALSO begs for his accountability. It is the height of hypocrisy for a leader to make a vow that he will smoke the enemy out of his cave (which he has failed to do), when he, himself, does not step out of his own cave and answer all the people he leads. For example, he owes as a leader those who rightfully question for the sake of the dead, proof of the video that reveals the 'plane' that hit the Pentagon. I assure you, that the list of that which is questionable is enormous. However, I refuse to get caught up in the argument over whether or not he has lied. My argument is one that questions his leadership and his motives...not the words that have fallen from his lips. The more we make debate over everything else, we thereby lose ourselves within the war, and miss THE important bull's eye. A free society should not allow such room for any leader's actions to go unaccounted for. George W. Bush stamped his approval on this divide, as he has failed to account for his leadership. To ease such a conflict, any good leader would wish to amend this problem rather than continue to hide behind it. Devotion to a leader and his cause should not foremost closely relate itself merely by that leader's actions, but rather it should be concerned with the leadership itself and the accountability of those actions. Until such accountability, his bullets will never fly true. Let us not, as a free people, get lost in debates, thereby missing our own bull's eye. I leave with these words: Theodore Roosevelt, (1858-1919), 26th president, once said, "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."

Answer 8

We are mad at GWB because he's putting our troops in a situation that they didn't need to be in. As of march 19, 2003 there were no WMDs and there was no terrorism in Iraq. There are still no WMDs in Iraq, but thanks to BUSH, There is plenty of terrorism going on.
Our soldiers are just doing their jobs. The Jihadist, and the Insurgents are just doing their jobs. It's the US government, especially GWB and his administration NOT doing their jobs. That's why we are mad at him.

Answer 9

Liberals get angry at President Bush because he doesn't buckle under to the liberal party agenda. He frustrates them because they think he should buy the marxist line like democrat voters do. They hate the fact that he is gullibility-challenged.

Answer 10

Because I believe he has mismanaged the war.

Answer 11

Because he does not listen to the American people and has flaunted the system of checks and balances numerous times.