English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

29 answers

Obviously the Pentagon plane wasn't a plane at all, with the 7 ft square damage to the building that jumbo jetliner would never fit through. There would be a crater a mile long with debris scattered everywhere. RPG's on the other hand make nice 7ft holes in buildings. I guess it is going to take a Democrat President to get the real truth since the Republicans currently in office would rather have scandal and corruption as their legacy.

2007-06-11 09:04:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

If you slam an object into another object, there are several effects
1) The weaker object is destroyed - aluminum is not as strong as steel, therefore, the plane disintegrates.

2) Heat is created - aluminum melts at a much lower temperature than steel.

When you combine these two effects along with the fire created by fuel and furnishings, coupled with the updraft created by the heat itself, you will find that the aluminum will vanish, or at least seem to.

If you have doubts, throw an ordinary aluminum can into a fireplace or a camp fire.

2007-06-11 16:15:53 · answer #2 · answered by Charlie S 6 · 0 0

You mean the 4 planes that defied aviation history and the only 4 planes ever to do so. Yeah I have asked that many times and just get called a wacko. When in fact if you look at the actual FACTS, that is what they claim took place. Poof planes gone. I have always said it is harder to prove the reasons the 9/11 commission report has put out than it is the conspiracy theorists. This fact however does not deter anyone from calling us wack jobs. They must watch David Copperfield and be totally amazed. All you have to do is the same as I did and know something was not right. Go look up similar accidents from across the globe and see all the plane wreckage, the buildings that were hit in similar fasions and are still standing to this day, etc etc. Its a joke that people actually believe the reasons we are given for what took place that day.

Edit. I just read some of the other answers, these people are simply moronic like I stated above. First military planes are made up of totally different materials and not to mention a third of the size of a commercial airliner. Second that put the picture of that engine that would have a hard time making a leer jet fly let alone a 757. Third to Kim comparing a fiberglass corvette to a 60 ton airliner, great comparison moonbat. The answers you have received are just people afraid of the truth. Oh also the one that said conspiracies don't work if there are more than 2 people involved yet JFK seemed to work out pretty good. Even the courts have ruled there was more than one shooter just from pure physics.

2007-06-11 15:20:12 · answer #3 · answered by bs b 4 · 3 7

Vaporized? As they were in the building when it collapsed and the remains of the building burned for weeks I will say they were reduced to ashes but no vaporized. We all say the planes hit on TV.

2007-06-11 15:21:15 · answer #4 · answered by Brian 7 · 0 1

that's not true i have seen it before that's what happened most of the time when a plane comes down in a dive and slams into the ground at high speeds there is not much left i can think of 2 right of the top of my heard the valujet 592 in the Florinda everglades and there was a twine engine plane in northern Indiana

2007-06-11 15:41:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

What plane vaporized? There were plenty of parts found at all the sites.

Ever been to a crash site. I have, and if a plane hits the ground at 500 mph, there isn't much left.

I would suggest that you give up using episodes of Lost as your basis for plane crash investigation.

2007-06-11 15:18:59 · answer #6 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 5 2

I didn't know that there were so many planes flying into building instances in which I could compare this too. Generally things that explode ultimately detoriate under the extreme temparture of fire. Furtermore, pieces of the plane did fall too the street. So saying the plane vaporized is inaccurate.

2007-06-11 15:17:12 · answer #7 · answered by tobcol 5 · 4 2

Why do you think the planes vaporized? The 9/11 Commission report does not suggest this is the case.

2007-06-11 15:16:10 · answer #8 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 6 2

No airplanes vaporized on 9/11. Facts are our friends!

2007-06-11 15:30:44 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1 1

There's a clip on Youtube of an F-4 Phantom hitting a concrete block at 500 mph that pretty well debunks your theory. Boom, all that's left is the concrete block. No fuzzy science here.

2007-06-11 15:26:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers