Would you vote for a candidate that told workers to pave over 9/11 remains and lied about toxic dust to rescue

Question

I sure wouldn't!

I hate liars who are to rich to care

This isn't a game anymore

I didn't even need to say his name and you all knew I was talking about Gulliani!

Just goes to show not everyone is as blind as the sheep of denial

Answer 1

I totally agree with you, and the rescue workers, who should be treated like heroes will be the ones who suffer in the long term as well as their families.

People do not realize that our government couldn't give a rat's a@@ about its citizens, they think our President is doing what is best for us, too bad some people live in a fantasy world.

Answer 2

I think you are talking about Rudy Giuliani, right? No, I would not vote for him. In New York he has a reputation for being a bully, and the lies to the 9-11 rescue workers are utterly unacceptable, disgraceful.

Answer 3

I have alot of problems with Giuliani (I'm assuming thats who youre talking about)

He has an ego the size of Texas.

He has a tendency to try to run things in an autocratic way, mocks and attacks people who disagree with him, and capitalizes on 9-11 constantly, which I find disgusting.

Not to mention that being a mayor does not qualify anyone to be president. I dont care what city you were mayor of, thats just not enough.

Answer 4

right here's a great whopper: “however the component is that, one, we are able to win this conflict. we are able to win it relatively.” John McCain, Jan 22, 2003 "as quickly as I voted to assist this conflict, I knew it replaced into in all probability going to be long and puzzling and puzzling" Jan 3, 2007 in case you will possibly need to work out extra, basically form "McCain lies" into any seek engine. And, while you are going to quote a lie with the aid of a candidate, you shoudl verify your info your self. Obama replaced into born in the U. S. after Kennedy replaced into killed. McCain's one hundred year fact replaced into taken out of context, yet so replaced into Obama's recent fact approximately clinging to weapons and faith. What those applicants stated replaced into relatively plenty different, yet area of politics is to misrepresent the different area. i think of you comprehend that thought okay.

Answer 5

I hope they erect an even nicer building where the WTC used to be. It will serve as a functional landmark/memorial for centuries to come.

I'll be voting for the candidate who is most opposed to bigger government. I won't be voting based upon this retarded internet banter.

Answer 6

NO! In fact, I think the old WTC ought to be made into a memorial for all the people who died that day that never should have. Any politician who would pour concrete over this site won't get my vote!

Answer 7

ok look,

Rudy has other issues that are more valid than this,

This reads like Mudslinging, and I think that as a politician, He has other issues that are more solid, and valid

No I wont be voting for him, however, we can do better than them in this by pointing out their flaws, Not by sinking to there level and muddying ourselves in the process,

The time for that is done now (we should have been gloves off mudslinging the sec. time bush was elected,)

Now it is time for a candidate that has answers and solutions,

Answer 8

Paving over remains is generally not cool.

Answer 9

Hillary, Al gore and Ron Paul should all be ashamed. They all lied about attemps to rescue toxic dust.

Answer 10

I wouldn't vote for Ghouliani if he had the cure for Aids in one hand and a endorsement from God in the other.