English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-06-11 06:08:04 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

7 answers

Sure. A loser lives off the efforts of those who try and fail. Then he whines because he's not accomplished like all of the failures around him. He justifies his stance by trying to reverse society's views on what being a failure is versus being a loser.

Hence, we have undue media attention to garnish sympathy for people who are useless eaters, such as Paris Hilton.

2007-06-11 07:01:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

losers do not struggle enough in order to win....but sometimes you fail after a serious trial to succeed.

anybody could be a failure....but loser is always a failure.

2007-06-11 13:58:19 · answer #2 · answered by PLUTO 6 · 0 0

A failure tries and fails.

A loser doens't try and fails.

Joe

2007-06-11 13:12:12 · answer #3 · answered by Joseph G 6 · 0 0

a loser just doesnt do ****! and that is why he is a loser!
a failure does things but fails at them!

2007-06-11 13:16:16 · answer #4 · answered by chloalikev 3 · 0 0

Yes.
It's my opinion that if you play/try and you lose, you're a "loser".
BUT, keep in mind that it's for this occasion only; if you play/try again, your potential to win is still there...
The only time you become a failure is when you stop playing/trying.

2007-06-11 15:01:15 · answer #5 · answered by socalgramma 1 · 0 0

No. Both are experiencing life from the perspective of judgment -- by the self or by others.

The implied polarities would be a winner and a success.

Caring about such labels is a source of suffering.

2007-06-11 13:14:45 · answer #6 · answered by guru 7 · 0 0

ya the defference between you and yourself ohhh burn!!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-06-11 13:16:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers