English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Most likely not.

There is no way that a rational human being could actually support abortions after seeing one.

2007-06-11 03:58:25 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

I agree Brian.

It disgusts me.

2007-06-11 04:03:31 · update #1

@walterdisney

you're right.
you're not.

2007-06-11 04:07:22 · update #2

30 answers

I really kind of doubt it. Watching people tearing apart unborn babies can change your mind real quick.

2007-06-11 04:08:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 7

Just to ease your mind, nobody in our home would have an abortion, ever. But, it is not my decision to make for a teenage mom, a poor single mom, a dying patient, an overproductive mom or any other STRANGER. How can I tell someone that I don't know to start living thier life more like I do? The first thing that they will say is, "Who the HELL are you", then, "what the HELL do you care what I do"?

And they would be right in saying so. So we mind our own business and work on issues that concern us...like paying bills, feeding our children, cleaning our house, volunteering to help the homeless, needy, handicapped and seniors.

2007-06-11 04:26:57 · answer #2 · answered by joe_on_drums 6 · 3 0

Pro-Choice doesn't always mean Pro-Abortion, people. It's for giving a woman the choice of how she handles her pregnancy. Whether that be through having it, putting it up for adoption, or abortion.

Just because I'm Pro-Choice doesn't mean I'm Pro-Abortion. But I think it's morally wrong to take rights away from anyone.

2007-06-11 04:16:13 · answer #3 · answered by Jeremiah 5 · 4 1

you could think of that way simply by fact the two you do not have self belief "it" is a splash one from theory or you think that the life of a splash one is secondary to the income of the female. whilst professional-lifers have self belief "it" is a splash one from theory then we gained't conceive of any difficulty the place killing the toddler is desirable/suitable. it does not count number in case you do no longer "want/like" this option of killing a splash one - you're prepared to do it/condone it. in case you do no longer oppose an action then you definately condone it. As to this "women human beings have the the final option to % approximately their bodies" they are no longer killing "their physique" they're killing a splash one. If a woman desires to regulate THEIR physique then consistent with possibility they might have the female aborted from around the toddler and save the toddler. it incredibly is a woman figuring out on approximately their physique.

2016-10-07 07:13:40 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

So many others have said, rightly, that one massively invasive medical procedure is as visually disturbing as another. Ever seen a liposuction? I guarantee you it's just as disgusting.

I specifically chose to mention lipo because in *some* instances it is, *arguably*, even more of an "elective" procedure than you would paint abortion to be. So, as you would ban what you no doubt deem "elective" abortion, will you also call for a ban on liposuction?

2007-06-11 05:02:21 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 1 2

Yes. I had one at 5 weeks , RU486, and you pass it at home. it was just like a heavy period.
Since late term abortiond are illegal, I wonder why they are alwyas the ones shown to prove a point? I also wonder why someone would LIE AND SAY THEY HAVE SEEN LIMBS RIPPED OFF OF A BABY DURING AN ABORTION? Because that is so obviously a lie to anyone who has any kind of idea what they are talkning about. Yoiu know, RATIONAL PEOPLE, not those who lie and flame to try and make a point. If your argument is so compelling, why not use the TRUTH?

2007-06-11 04:06:45 · answer #6 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 8 3

How do you feel about a crack addict prostitute, who is no longer able to get an abortion because there is no choice, in the first weeks of her pregnancy, and ends up several months later in the ER for a drug overdose, and severe malnutrition,and not to mention tons of other crap, that's when it gets disgusting, the body rejects on its own the starving drug infested undeveloped fetus. Did that baby feel anything when it died so harshly?

2007-06-11 04:15:04 · answer #7 · answered by gag t 1 · 4 2

I've seen pictures of aborted children.

I'm still pro-choice.

The procedure may be grisly, and sometimes the procedure is heart-wrenching, but abortion is necessary.

Put yourself in the place of one of the women who has to have an abortion because she will either die or because she is raped, has no money to support a child, is young, lives in an abusive situation, or simply does not want the child.

Get down off your high horse.

2007-06-11 04:21:44 · answer #8 · answered by Katharine D 2 · 3 3

Yes. I know that abortion is a horrible thing.

However there are more things to the debate. If abortion was to no longer be upheld by the highest courts in the land then we need to focus on education, both sexual education and parenting classes, nationalized health care and day care. We also need to work on our foster care system

If you love children that much, focus on the ones that are born. Foster.

2007-06-11 04:04:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 7 2

So if we invent an abortion that isn't disgusting to watch, will you become pro-choice? How about the abortion pill?

2007-06-11 05:03:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I've seen it and I support it. I guess I'm not a "rational human being."

2007-06-11 04:05:17 · answer #11 · answered by Chief Yellow Horse 4 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers