choose only one and explain
2007-06-11 01:02:27 · 12 answers · asked by Nick 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
Why choose only one?
That clearly an unscientific inquiry!
The Bible tells you WHAT happened,
Science tells you HOW it happened.
There are other scriptures of the world that also deal with creation. What makes The Bible correct and the other scriptures incorrect? -- GIVE EVIDENCE!!
Can't give evidence?...
That's the difference between science and faith!
.
2007-06-11 01:56:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Forgive me if I say these answers seem biased. But I have been on both ends. I have both believed in the biblical and the scientific. But in the end I stuck with the biblical for various reasons. Many people would argue that human beings have been around longer than the bible would suggest therefore science is right. However it has been said by many scientists that the dust on the moon would suggest how old the earth is thus giving a good indicative of how long humans have been around. For every inch of moon dust it would be 1000 years. They believed they would find enough inches to make up millions of years. There were I believe 4 inches. My point is science isnt always right. As for the biblical I personally found it confusing until I studied genesis and truly began to understand the creation of man. Just read through the first chapters and you will see how everything connects perfectly. Every human has that one thing thats missing in their lives we all know Gods there but we all try to fill that void with somethig else. When I was leaning more toward science I was depressed. Something was missing. But when I went for the Biblical reasoning I felt complete like some new feeling. It was amazing. Now im not saying science is bad but when it comes to their creation theories well their just theories.
2007-06-11 08:23:34 · answer #2 · answered by pony 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Pure evolutionists and the agnostic would have you believe that the Bible misrepresents grossly the origin of man. This is erroneous. The Bible in the book of Genesis sets no time line. Indeed it has been said that a day to God is like 1000 years to us. The one thing the agnostic cannot dismiss is that fact that DNA is a code. There are no naturally occuring codes. (show me an example of one--you can't) All codes are thought up by a mind. DNA being a code was created by a mind. What you choose to believe about that mind is up to you. (the Bible says God...Zacharia Citchin says the Annunaki or Nephlim--mentioned in the book of Genesis)
I'm not saying science is wrong. Science is the search for truth. The scientific method says simply that if one says an apple is red he must have someone else look at the apple and agree that it is red then once enough people look at that apple and say its red then it becomes a statement that apples are red. Just remember that since science was made by the the mind of man it is fallible as man himself is fallible. (Granny Smith apples are green--and they are apples)
2007-06-11 09:45:17 · answer #3 · answered by Deslok of Gammalon 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would simply like to point out that the way the question is asked certainly suggests that anyone who chooses "Biblical" is immediately unscientific.
I personally believe wholeheartedly in the accuracy of science, but believe man more than likely resulted from some sort of divine intervention or design. When I look at life and the universe, it seems too beautiful to be the result of randomness, yet so complex that we barely scratch the surface of what there is to know. Seems to me that it all came from somewhere...
2007-06-11 08:14:35 · answer #4 · answered by Jonny Jo 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There is a hige amount of evidence on the scientific ideas of the origin of man. You can even go and see some of it while on your holidays. For instance, if you like Spain you can go to the caves in Altamira and see paintings on the walls that date back twice as far as the bible would place the origin of all time.
2007-06-11 08:06:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The scientific view on this has mountains of evidence to back itself up. The biblical view ignores, misrepresents or suppresses the evidence.
2007-06-11 08:25:28 · answer #6 · answered by Nature Boy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely not Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden.
2007-06-14 21:32:20 · answer #7 · answered by johnandeileen2000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Science. It's based on facts. Biblical relies on blind faith and still requires intervention by another being.
2007-06-11 08:06:24 · answer #8 · answered by Gene 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
4000 year old creation myths that were stolen from Babylon. Gotta be true.
2007-06-11 09:29:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The one which has empirical data supporting. Hint - it's not the Bible.
2007-06-11 08:10:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋