2007-06-11 00:00:57 · 41 answers · asked by Silkie1 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
damn, that will be me out then....
and i was doing so well too.....
2007-06-16 23:37:08 · answer #1 · answered by tim 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IQ has nothing to do with age. An IQ of 18 would roughly that of a stunned cockroach.
Therefore, I suggest YOU be banned, as you are obviously too stupid to be allowed near a computer. In fact, did you get someone to type the question for you? Or was it just a very big coincidence that you hit the buttons in the right order to make a question?
Actually, the question should really be....'should people who post really stupid questions be prevented from breeding and contaminating the gene pool'?
2007-06-16 14:23:55 · answer #2 · answered by Subic 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should have 2 separate Answers divided into age groups. I'm a little tired of getting called an idiot and it's usually misspelled over perfectly rational answers and I know that the person is maybe 12. An IQ test for entry into Answers is a great idea. Maybe they could divide the groups into IQs.
2007-06-11 00:08:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well this is a good question but there can be so many answers. This is just an idea but why doesnt Yahoo Answers do different catagories for age, IQ, spam chat etc etc. I do see your point and where your comming from on this one. For now, just try to ignore the Silly Q&A and get on earning those stars & points. Have fun.
2007-06-18 04:17:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can only assume you are joking. Anyone able to write should be allowed. One word I hate above any other is the word banned. Which is different from saying a thing should not be allowed because it is a crime. And that is why there are laws. And used because for instance if the government had made a law saying smoking is a crime so calling smokers criminals there would have been an outcry so they bring in a law but call it smoking banned.See the difference?.
2007-06-18 13:13:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt that someone with an IQ of under 18 could even read these questions...
2007-06-18 05:03:38 · answer #6 · answered by L_PJS 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. But logging on to the internet should be driven by a unique tag and password for all individuals. This tag and password should be able to be permanently banned. All posts online should be tied to this tag. In this way all the losers, cyber pimps, paedophiles, zoosexers and spammers would dry up overnight. After all, there's caller ID for when a sicko calls you.
2007-06-17 22:22:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm 17 years old but I have an IQ higher then 18! LOL! Yay!
2007-06-11 00:05:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
IQ is not in line with age. Many teens are wiser than some adults. Anyway, a wider age range provides a wider perspective.
2007-06-18 20:45:06 · answer #9 · answered by HopeGrace 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What about those with an IQ that is more than an 18 year old's? without young teens it might not be as fun anymore.but then there are some questions that are not appropriate for them to see,so hmm.......
2007-06-11 00:09:57 · answer #10 · answered by aMUSEd 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well i dont think iq should have anything to do with it but i do think it should be over 18 as some of the questions and answers , are aimed at people over 18 and there are a lot of younger people reading things they shouldnt be.
2007-06-11 00:07:48 · answer #11 · answered by kt 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋