People are so stupid, I get it, I guess you have to be on a higher plane. Your quote "To assume we are wrong to be in Iraq is to assume that all those who died on 9/11 meant nothing to this country". means if we ignored Saddam's and his Bio weapon scare, we put this country at risk for another attack, it leaves you with impression that its not worth fighting over, right? gimme the points lol
2007-06-10 21:24:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by gag t 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
The people who should be forced into therapy are those who deserted their conservative values and voted the Libs into the majority. Sure the conservatives forsook their values and paid the price, which is what the voters intended. However, to buy into the Lib lies about reform and ethics when their only goals were discrediting President Bush, repealing the tax cuts, raising taxes, and losing the war....they have no excuse for what they did. They have weakened the country and put the rest of us in a very vulnerable position.
The fact of the matter is that every Lib that voted for the war had the same intelligence that the President did. Is voting for the war and then flip-flopping like Clinton and Edwards considered a mental illness? If so we need to put them on Dr. Phil!
2007-06-10 19:20:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by cadcommando2003 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
I don't belong to any party list nor I believe fully in just one of them. However, when it comes to this issue. It has been clear, written, proven, talked about by the people themselves who decided to do pre-emptive attack that we made a mistake! there is no WMD (this info has been all over the place god damn it!), there were no al-qaeda in Iraq then, Saddam ain't doing us nothing. So why are we there again? killing their people leaving chemical and nuclear wastes from our US made weapons? Why did we risk the lives of our family, our young children? Why did we not listen to military strategist and let them do what they do best (serve and protect with better intelligence).
I REPEAT, 9/11 got nothing to do with Iraq so there go get yourself a psych eval and those who are like you that are not open to information but would rather stick to it like glue just to conveniently belong.
If you are in your 20's then God bless you. I originally have a lot of faith in my cohorts that maybe we will be the generation who will no longer subscribe to this duality and the dual party system but instead critically think and rely on logic, facts, and proper unbiased investigation of more facts. Sigh.
Without law enforcement we will perish you said? Good grief. It is like you telling us we are a bunch of crazy animals with no capability of discrenment and higher brain functioning. What a very misguided statement.
People, it is time to wake up and break off the mold we were formed into and marinating in comfort for all these years. This is the time to think, question, and know. We need our freedom back and those who are taking it are those who we entrusted to lead us (referring to policiticians belong to the popular dem or rep).
We needed to be in Iraq to be able to watch closer Iraq's neighbor, Iran. We needed Iraq-in that need we sacrificed thousands of people.
Wake up, wake up please. We are of the human race and we should love each and communicate to each other as human first and the rest are secondary differences.
Namaste to all.
2007-06-11 03:05:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Though I am not an American, me and my family and a majority of normal decent people felt deeply disturbed with what happened on 9/11. I know people who cried sitting at home a million miles away watching the Americans struggle with the tremendous loss that was suffered even though it did not effect them in any way. Our condolences are always with those who lost their loved ones. May GOD rest their souls and help them find peace in the afterlife.
However, I have to disagree with your view that the war in Iraq has anything to do with 9/11. Bush has all but annihilated that country and its poor people. Was the tyranny of Saddam not enough for these people to suffer through most of their lives? How has the presence of American troops helped this situation at all? This just seems like a power struggle, an attempt by BUSH to gain the oil in Iraq, just like his father did in the early 90's. Or maybe like taking revenge for 9/11 (if this is case, then what's the difference between Bush and Osama, both are getting hundreds and thousands of innocent civilians killed everyday). And where are the Weapons of Mass destruction that were supposed to be used against the US? Don't just tag along with the crap that the media and your incompetent President are feeding you. Come out of the box, look at the situation completely and then think for yourself. Leave the people in Iraq alone. They'll get by without you. Bring your soldiers home. stop your PRESIDENT from getting your soldiers killed for his benefit!
In my opinion, which I'm sure is shared by millions worldwide, BUSH is not competent or caring enough to be president of the united states. He does not care about the American people, all he cares about is himself. I've met a lot of Americans in my life and the general population there are decent, good and caring people, who are under threat BECAUSE of your president's actions! The war is not between Iraq and AMERICA, it's between BUSH and Iraq and innocent people are getting caught in the cross fire on both sides.
2007-06-10 19:42:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by PickledBrains 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
in case you would be extra particular i could comprehend what those crimes are. He replaced into interior his power to deliver the protection tension to Afghanistan and Iraq and get Congressional approval to do bypass into those international places even inspite of the shown fact that he did not like it. They arrested Saddam and drove the Taliban out of finished power in Afghanistan. The Iraq conflict would have been a mistake in hindsight yet Saddam positioned out plenty phony education to intelligence that he replaced into looked as though it would have WMDs. i think of whether he have been charged, the president might pardon him (even Obama) because of the fact attempting him does not be in the suitable interest of the country with all the different issues it incredibly is dealing with. I even have heard of no such stream to attempt him for conflict crimes.
2016-11-10 01:55:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, Lee, you can no longer say you have yet to hear from a sane human being that Bush has committed any war crime.
So, what are you gonna go about having a war criminal for a president? Write him a love letter?
2007-06-10 19:33:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by cranberrychutney 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
"To assume we are wrong to be in Iraq is to assume that all those who died on 9/11 meant nothing to this country[?]" how dare you say such? preposterous.
as for war crimes read the record.
2007-06-10 19:49:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
It would all depend on who put Bush on trial. If it was almost any Islamic nation you can name I wouldn't give him much of a chance. However, in that the war itself is a crime, then the least we could do is have an inditment, a jury trial with as much representation as required for the defendant and all of the rules of trials adhered to. If the trial was 'fair' according to all the rule and he was found guilty, then good luck to him. If found not-guilty then he walks. All the rest of your mishagass post is gibberish!
2007-06-10 19:32:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Noah H 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
And what did Iraq have to do with 9/11?? Refresh my memory.. I believe the president said one of the hardest parts of his job is connecting 9/11 to Iraq. Go figure.
Over 650,000 people are dead in Iraq. Not to mention the homeless, limbless, orphaned, and starving. To assume it is ok to be in Iraq is to assume those people are somehow less important than we are.
2007-06-10 19:25:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by jessica m 3
·
6⤊
2⤋
Okay, lee, it's a war crime to bomb civilians. Bush did this and admitted it, cause he was in pursuit of Saddam, he said.
It's a war crime to bomb civilian infrastructure. Bush did this.
I'm sure you know torture is a war crime. I'm sure you know we tortured people to death in Abu Ghraib. Or, we fraternity pranked them to death anyway.
We attacked a country that was not attacking us. That's a war crime.
Now do you get it? Bush is a war criminal. Yes, he is. And he did it with our money, our name, our honor. Pretty reprehensible. And you support him.
9/11 has nothing to do with Iraq - c;mon, bush lied to you for years about that, but then he said he didn't know why you think it did.
poor poor pitiful slayn - confront by reality, you can only curse. so sad. except that you're hurting our country. could you please stop?
2007-06-10 19:24:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by cassandra 6
·
5⤊
2⤋