English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you think that the attacks on America were just as bad as when America attacked Japan by dropping the bomb on Hiroshima? I think that sadly, what goes around comes around. America killed thousands more people in Japan by the bomb they dropped, so what does George Bush expect, when America does things like this to other countrys?

2007-06-10 18:58:52 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

14 answers

"D" this is totally asinine and a cow of a different color: what's wrong with you: don't you see the differences, the areas of world suppression?

History, or have you forgotten, maybe you never learned, Japan refused to surrender, against all odds and, vowed to fight to the last woman and child and, In fact, trained all youngsters under the age of ten, to fight to the death. McCarthur (General) had over five million swords taken away from Japanese citizens that were to fight to the death.
U.S. Government had four (That's 4) million men going to invade Japan, with a total casualty rate estimated of at least one half million on our side alone.
If you were us, which shoe would you put on? them or us. My dad was one of those men, after fighting in Europe for over four years, probably to help your Country, he was then sent to the South Pacific to invade Japan. It was, thank goodness, called off after the "Bomb" and, I'd have it done again. It brought my dad home, along with a half million that would never have come home. We didn't bomb Pearl Harbor.

BY the way: this wasn't an attack on America, it only took place here, there were 36 Countries involved, most were Europeons, probably from your own Country, again, Look at History.

2007-06-10 23:24:18 · answer #1 · answered by cowboydoc 7 · 2 0

The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki SAVED thousands of lives that would have been lost, on both sides. If a full scale invasion would have occurred, it would have prolonged the end of WWII significantly, and killed many more people than the bombings did. So 9/11 was in fact much worse. It was an unnecessary, undeserved attack, that killed thousands of innocents for no reason whatsoever.

2007-06-10 21:01:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

First of all Japan struck the first blow by bombing Pearl Harbor. We weren't even in the war at the time.

Secondly, the terrorist attacks on America were planned long before Bush even became President. Clinton was aware of Al Quaeda and tried to do some things about it so all this hog wash that some guy named Bush cooked up this big scheme is just plain ignorance, and I mean that in the respectful use of the word.

2007-06-11 00:39:29 · answer #3 · answered by Moose 5 · 2 1

Friend,
First you should know one thing. It was created by USA only to get a way to attack the Muslim countries. A great politics was behind of this twin tower attack. After this attack, US invaded Afhanistan and Iraq.
so you can not say that it was done by others, since it was made by USA it self.

The attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the response of USA for the Japan's attack of Pearl Harbour. So in that attack, nothing wrong was there, since it was done first by Japan. USA replied. That's all.
but if we talk about the present situation, we can say USA, especially Bush, is playing a great politics in the world. Iraq and Afhanistan was attacked in the name of response Islamic Terrorism. But actually iraq was attacked to capture the petroleum resources.
And Afhan was attacked to resist the dominance of Communism, which was influenced by Russia.
if you read those kind of critical politics, you will wonder.

2007-06-10 22:26:23 · answer #4 · answered by Mayur 1 · 1 2

America dropped the bomb because Japan refused to surrender and give up the Emperor. America dropped two nuclear bombs on them... and then allowed them to surrender and keep their Emperor. It was the biggest nuclear test in the world!!!

2007-06-10 21:36:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Japan attacked America. Not the other way around.
You need to read some proper history books.
And for the next person who says "it's all about oil". Woulnd't it be easier and cheaper just to buy the oil?

2007-06-10 23:45:26 · answer #6 · answered by True Blue Brit 7 · 1 0

We were at war with Japan, and you can bet your *** that if Japan had the A bomb first they would have used it.
Now I just would like to know what Bush did to warrant the attacks on innocent civilians........

2007-06-10 20:47:27 · answer #7 · answered by AJ H 1 · 0 1

No it wasnt as bad as bombing Japan. Japan wouldnt stop no matter what and bombing them ended the war, it was the absolute last resort.
9/11 was a terrorist attack serving no justice.

2007-06-10 19:02:09 · answer #8 · answered by jared l 4 · 5 0

It replaced into organic accident that the terrorists chosen September eleventh to attack ny. those dates have no particular magnitude in Islam and nor does September ninth. ordinary non secular Muslims could view numerology and so on. as irreligious. each year around the anniversary of 9/11 the risk-free practices amenities clearly get jumpy in basic terms in case of reproduction-cat assaults.

2016-10-08 23:21:31 · answer #9 · answered by siqueiros 4 · 0 0

how can u compare japan's attack was indescribable. i believe america had a greater view of what they were going to do. they knew how powerful there missiles were. i don't believe this is the case of what goes around comes around cuz were all gone destroy ourselves attacking places at random. human kind is going crazy.

2007-06-10 19:30:06 · answer #10 · answered by Jack 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers