When Barack Obama wins the presidency in 2008, will he sentence Cheney and Bush to war crimes in a tribunal?

Question

perhaps they can throw in Ashcroft, Rice, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Hasstert, Rove, Inhofe, Cunningham, and Hunter while they're at it!

Answer 1

You forgot Gonzales, he authored the memo that said the Geneva Conventions ddin't apply and allowed 145,000 violations of spying on citizens.

Answer 2

First Obama winning is doubtful.

Second he could not sentence them to anything in a tribunal as a tribunal has three judges not one.

Third if the people you mentioned were found guilty for war crimes by a tribunal most of the Democrats in the House and Senate would also have to be as they voted for this war that you obliquely claim to be illegal.

Thank you for taking the time out of your busy day to prove your ignorance to the masses.

Answer 3

1) Obama won't get nominated much less elected.
2) Neither Bush nor Cheney have committed any crimes.
3) Presidents don't convict or sentance people.

0/3 keep trying, someday you might get something right.

Answer 4

You should say IF Obama wins the Presidency and Presidents don't pass sentences on citizens, juries/judges do that.

Answer 5

If that inexperienced Muslim wins, I will totally lose all respect for the people in this country. If he wins the nomination, we will have another Republican president. I truly believe that. And I am a Democrat.

Answer 6

it extremely is an exceedingly convoluted subject. firstly, ethically conversing, i think the folk who participated in those acts do could desire to be punished. for each action there's a result and that i think of it extremely is shameful that having a intense societal status gets human beings out of consequences for their own poorly chosen judgements. i think of that if we do no longer something, it is showing different international locations that we detect this habit to be tolerable which i think of could in common terms have destructive ramifications on our usa and much extra so on destiny POWs. Politically conversing, i'm nevertheless torn. mutually as i think of alternative international locations will seem down upon us for no longer doing something approximately this occasion, i think of that it may seem terrible to have one administration attacking the different. even regardless of the undeniable fact that on the different hand, it may desire to help to extra desirable separate ourselves from Bush administration and it is judgements that many individuals besides as foreigners disapproved of. I comprehend that employing those "superior suggestions" could have been able to get us efficient information, yet some human beings have reported they could are starting to be the information without those methods. regardless of whether is replaced into effective or no longer, it replaced into incorrect. We signed the Geneva convention and if we will evaluate our usa a maximum efficient one, we could desire to uphold our grants. What replaced into the element of signed that if we do despite we desire? i'm in touch approximately helping the troops and having dated a guy interior the army, i will empathize with judgements that could desire to be made and how no longer difficulty-free they're, even regardless of the undeniable fact that; the nice and comfortable button is torture is incorrect; we devoted to humane strategies of treating POWs; and the folk who violated those rules could desire to stand some consequences.

Answer 7

Obama won't win and what war crimes have you conjured up in your little fantasy? Kind of shoots down your dream huh?

Answer 8

Substitute Dr. Ron Paul for the abomination and I would agree 100%. Sorry he is just Hillarys lap dog! His wife is a CFR member and if she wan't you never would have heard of him!

Answer 9

What do you think this is? Some banana republic?

My goodness! Can't you people just disagree with someone without wanting to arrest them and send the to the gulag, comrade?

.

Answer 10

And Breger, Clinton, Abramoff, Kennedy, Jefferson, Need i go on?