English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The former 3 guys NEVER won a title. Big Shot Rob is gonna have 7(!)

Then again, Big Shot Rob was a pretty one demensional player without HOF career numbers.

So I say no, we are right to leave Horry out.

What do you think?

2007-06-10 14:41:19 · 7 answers · asked by AgentZero 4 in Sports Basketball

Sir Charles Mailman and Stockton are all sure 1st ballot HOF players. But everyone (including myself ) hold then under a different light becuse they never won a title.

Horry has (or will have ) 7 titles. And most people (including me) think he shouldn't be in the Hall.

That is the hypocricy.

2007-06-10 15:00:12 · update #1

7 answers

Much as I like to watch Robert Horry shoot 3's, it doesn't look like his career stats measure up to the others'. Nothing hypocritical about that.

2007-06-10 14:54:42 · answer #1 · answered by Alice K 7 · 0 0

Satch Sanders has 8 rings.

Jim Luscutoff has 7 rings.

Neither of them are in the Hall of Fame.

Horry probably won't be either.

A team with Robert Horry as its best player wouldn't even make the playoffs...well, they might after they win the draft lottery a few times.

It would be a mistake to put Horry in the HOF. He doesn't deserve it.

If Russell wins 11 rings and Jordan six, how is Jordan the greatest of all time, if rings are the most important thing? Plenty of guys have more than six rings.

2007-06-10 21:59:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I think all should be hall of famers,but Horry.Barkley,Stockton and Malone are first ballet hall of famers ,but horry he will not get in not only because of his rings ,but because he is a great 3 point shooter, excellent defender and besides the shot he took on nash ,has been nothing but a class at. The best role player in the history of the NBA, dont think he will get in the Hall of Fame ,if rings count other guys would be in but he had a good career.Horry just doesnt have the numbers ,if he had the numbers id say yes

2007-06-10 21:54:05 · answer #3 · answered by john w 3 · 0 1

horry was at the right place at the right time. when it came down to a big shot he always came thru...but he is not a hall of famer

2007-06-10 21:49:05 · answer #4 · answered by SINZ 2 · 0 0

i agree horry was never a star. stars get into the hall-of-fame... not just winners.

2007-06-10 21:46:43 · answer #5 · answered by Lakers=Champs 2 · 0 0

For the life of me, I don't know why one wouldn't consider all FOUR of them Hall Of Fame bound..

2007-06-10 21:46:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

what does this have to do with being a hypocrite?

2007-06-10 21:45:19 · answer #7 · answered by Super 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers