Great Question. Best is the FAMILY!!!!
Would anyone trust Bill or Hillary Clinton to baby-sit their 12 year old daughter?????
No, not a single person!!!!!!
2007-06-10 12:14:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by wolf 6
·
10⤊
4⤋
The nambla bit is disturbing I would have to include them as the idiots for sure. I don't understand the sexual attraction to kids. I think kids are great and mostly get confused about a lot of stuff. So I definitely don't want some F&*^ing perve raising anybodys kid. I'm not down on decent people raising kids I'm just not into kids being drooled over by adults of whatever orientation. It's wrong. Some of these people would argue that way back in the day it was acceptable, what they fail to see is that people don't see it that way anymore, the law is the law by majority, so too bad.
Like I said kids don't know enough to realize that they are being used by demented adults, and turn out to be socially F%^&ed most always. But if the family isn't capable of doing right by the kid than unfortunately the state has to step in. Just because your the mother or father of a child dosen't mean that you have the kids best interest at heart or will do right by them. Kids must always come first, if the prospective parents don't know and understand that they've got no business having them.
No idiots should be raising our future.
2007-06-10 19:30:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Michael G 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Or is it Better that The Village Idiots raise a child?
Web Search:
James Dobson
Bush Administration policies
2007-06-10 19:17:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by ck4829 7
·
2⤊
5⤋
A family
2007-06-10 19:30:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Brian 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Definitely the family. Look how you have turned out after being raised by the "village Idiot??"
2007-06-10 19:24:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
5⤊
1⤋
It is better for a child's own family to raise it. "It takes a Village" , read it. Children do not belong in concentration camps, and this is the plan for children in this book. These camps disguised as Government Day Cares. I know exactly who NAMBLA is and it makes me want to throw up.
2007-06-10 19:18:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
Oh, a Village, of course! That way, Hillary could be mayor!
2007-06-11 02:02:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Barry auh2o 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lord have mercy! Leave the village idiots out of the child rearing and leave that to the family.
2007-06-10 19:14:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by vegaswoman 6
·
10⤊
2⤋
It is lots better for a FAMILY to raise the CHILD!!!!!!!!!
2007-06-10 19:31:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Depends on the family. I would not want my child to be told that he must follow Bush blindly without question even to their death..
I would also not want my child to be told to not to follow all of Gods Commandments in their life. That one "love thy neighbor as thy self is a hard one" How can you kill what you love?
Source, PBS, NPR and the BBC.. All Radio. No TV in my House...
2007-06-10 19:30:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by jl_jack09 6
·
0⤊
4⤋
Family because the VIs may not have the same values and beliefs as you and yours
2007-06-10 19:16:54
·
answer #11
·
answered by don h 1
·
6⤊
1⤋