English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

a lot better than clinton !

2007-06-10 10:36:43 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

27 answers

They want the 2008 ELECTION

2007-06-10 10:39:50 · answer #1 · answered by ColoradoBrew 2 · 6 4

Yes, President Bush has done a lot better job than President Clinton. They always brag about how intelligent Clinton was; they won't admit that both presidents went to the same type schools and were in the same type fraternities! Bush was not a draft dodger smoking pot!
But, give Clinton some credit; the stock market went up during his reign also, just not as much!
Of course they don't want to admit Bush's successes: that would mess up media's agenda!

2007-06-10 11:39:45 · answer #2 · answered by Nothingusefullearnedinschool 7 · 1 1

Where are your examples of what a good job Bush has done? The only thing I can think of is that he has done a fair job of helping deal with HIV/AIDS in Africa. That's about it. He's completely mismanaged this war, got us into a Mount Everest of debt that our grandchildren will still be paying for years in the future and divided this country almost as bad as it was during Vietnam. Clinton was a much better President, and the years of his two terms were pretty good for most of America, as I recall. By the way, I'm NOT a Democrat, just in touch with reality.

2007-06-10 10:57:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

permit me wager - we would desire to cut back taxes for the prosperous lower back? Braman - calling different individuals ignorant with out offering any evidence to lower back up your accusation is relatively affordable. The Bush tax cuts have been heavily weighted to the prosperous - that's the completed foundation of "trickle down". As for 5% unemployment and a recession not being the tip of the international. i don't bear in mind Republicans being that blaze with regards to the subject in 2001 whilst they tried in charge Bush's first recession on Clinton.

2016-11-10 00:57:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I can admit that Clinton did leave Bush a mess! And, Bush handled it fairly well. Although not perfect, he handled it well considering the mess that was left to him.
Foreign Policy failure after failure under Clinton.

Blocking the UN from preventing 700,000 Rwandan deaths
Sudan cruise missile attack
Bombing the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade
Kosovo bombing
Relations with Cuba
NAFTA
The consequence of 'The Butcher Of Serbia's' death remains the same. The only man in a position to legally implicate the real butchers of Serbia, Clark and Clinton, in war crimes that all but wiped an entire race off the map, is silenced. The establishment left press, who only cry bloody murder about a war if a Bush is in office, were quick off the mark to denounce questions about the nature of 'The Butcher's' death and rally round to defend their darling war criminals Clinton and Clark.

2007-06-10 11:04:29 · answer #5 · answered by Don't Know 5 · 2 2

Because Rove has done the Job...
Of course Neocons have also do the Job...
But Bush, has done nothing excepted making money out of petrol... All his Saudi friends have a lot of money for him, with the price of the petrol now... He will get a pretty good retirement...

2007-06-10 11:33:17 · answer #6 · answered by Jedi squirrels 5 · 1 1

Are you saying the lesser of two evils?
This is still evil.
Read HSPD 20 here
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html
This executive order, which your buddy Gush just penned into existence.
This law, which Gush so brazenly passed without any oversight, revokes the constitution in case of any emergency which he decides is an emergency. This law redefines terms, and sets precedence beyond his capeabilities, but he is taking it into his own hands to enact whatever he sees fit because, thanks to komrad klinton & kohorts he has the executive power to use as he sees fit. Read the book common sense government by al gore. I was quite shocked. . .and I thought I was shock proof!

2007-06-10 14:32:12 · answer #7 · answered by masmpg 2 · 0 0

I can admit that he has done a better job than Clinton at keeping his interns dresses clean.

2007-06-10 11:05:04 · answer #8 · answered by stephen v 2 · 2 2

Bush is as much of a liar as Clinton and in addition he has pis--d off his own base and is stupid and acts stupid. I really feel the American people are/will suffer by making the mistake of electing this dummy. And for all you PHD candidates who will say, he must have been smart to get elected. His PR people duped the American people., that is how he got elected.

2007-06-10 10:59:29 · answer #9 · answered by magpie 6 · 1 3

Because although Clinton did a terrible job, it is no excuse for the idiocracy of George W. Bush. I think Bush has done a terrible job leading us into a war in which we are not a part of. We as a country were never attacked by the country of Iraq, Iraq has no weapons of mass destruction, and we are in Iraq for no reason at all (except for some politicians hidden agenda).

2007-06-10 10:47:06 · answer #10 · answered by Vincent 2 · 5 5

Its not their job. Their job is too say mean and hateful things about anyone who thinks differently than they do.

2007-06-13 02:41:12 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers