English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3000 more

2007-06-10 10:21:31 · 18 answers · asked by impeachbushnoww 1 in Politics & Government Politics

dum republicans
what does a terrosit look like

ha ha ha ha hah ha

2007-06-10 10:25:53 · update #1

18 answers

Believe it oor not. But this is verifiable, he has still NOT reached Clintons number...

2007-06-10 10:25:14 · answer #1 · answered by Jeff Engr 6 · 3 1

whether Bush is in or out of office, will not change the fact that there are troops in Iraq and it will not change that reasons for which we are there. Remember, this country is not run by dictators, the men and women in office and in teh senate and house make the decisions as well, and they are elected by the people. Also the troops cannot just be pulled out instantly, there is a political process as well. I don't think you should be so narrowminded and opinionated about one part of the machine, when every part contributes, including you.

2007-06-10 10:27:45 · answer #2 · answered by Asperon 2 · 4 1

I am sure gald this was not the generalized opinion of country when George, and Abe were in office or any other President who had war during his terms. Putting a number on lives lost in a war is a risk no one would want to take. .

2007-06-10 10:31:40 · answer #3 · answered by gag t 1 · 2 1

Absolute proof that ignorance is bliss.

"Ha ha ha ha hah ha"

Does this seem like an appropriate conclusion to a question about the number of American troops that will die?

2007-06-10 10:56:31 · answer #4 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0 2

The dictator wannabe said that he will continue his "blood for oil" war as long as he is in office, and watch for some stunt, like a major disaster, that will keep him in office as long as the republicans need him.

I hate to think of all the young Americans who will be give up their lives, just to put big bucks in the pockets of greedy corporations.

Just one is far too many.

.

2007-06-10 10:40:56 · answer #5 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 1 2

Not as many as have due to Clinton. If the coward had done his job while president we won't be in this mess now.

Of course you can elect Hilary. She will disband the military and then civilians can DIE instead.

2007-06-10 10:26:58 · answer #6 · answered by Gunny Bill 3 · 3 1

ok Dude, first of all, conflict is conflict. i do no longer understand in case you think of that it truly is exciting situations for those human beings that have served time over interior the middle East and had crap explode around us on a very consistent foundation, you're mistaken. although, the common public human beings (being the lads and girls who've/are served/ing) signed our call on the dotted line to guard our us of a. There are the few who in basic terms tried to run removed from a existence they did no longer like and ended up in something they do no longer understand. Screw them. You volunteered, you're taking the possibility. once you're looking at numbers asserting that there are too many loss of existence, then you definately ought to examine what freedom costs. in case you think of that status outdoors a place waving banners and burning flags is going to remedy something, then you definately are sorely mistaken. human beings try this attempting to coach a factor that they do no longer trust political aspects of protection tension movements. understand that the severe overwhelming majority of the protection tension see this and desire to kick the crap out of all human beings in that crowd. what share will die? Pull up on your ears and say "pop." Now which you have your head out... think of of what we are combating against. it truly isn't a typical conflict. it truly is able with civilians we try to help look after over there to help them to stabilize there worldwide. In turn, if there section is stabilized then it critically decreases the possibility of yet another September eleventh to take place. i do no longer understand what you have been doing on that day, yet i will relatively plenty assure which you weren't one human beings that have been working severe long hours to coach for in spite of our Commander in chief necessary us to do. I submit to in concepts the 1st few days vividly and that i could wish you do too. So what share will die? As many as ought to to steer away from your butt from getting killed by technique of a terrorist.

2016-12-12 17:15:37 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It just depends, on if the Liberals decide to back our Troops, instead of our opposition.

2007-06-10 10:26:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Better question....

How many more Americans will die before we SEAL the BORDER??????
Americans die everyday at the hands of illegal aliens.....more then in the war.

2007-06-10 12:26:34 · answer #9 · answered by usaf.primebeef 6 · 0 1

Like someone else said,he hasn't reached Clinton's number yet.He hasn't ordered the bombing of an aspirin factory either.

2007-06-10 10:28:40 · answer #10 · answered by PICKER 1 · 3 1

I'm afraid lots more will; especially if we invade Iran. Vote Ron Paul and he'll take 'em out.

2007-06-10 10:57:20 · answer #11 · answered by chicken 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers