Kind of like when Kennedy took out South Vietnam's Diem in November 1963 for not obeying Washington's orders.
2007-06-10 09:50:00 · 3 answers · asked by Super Cougar 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
well, it's not as if they were working themselves into the ground before...i heard one of the members of the parliament on npr saying that they only 'work' 3 days a week, no more than 4 hrs a day...but taking out malaki? bush???? that cretin couldn't take out the garbage without extensive re-training, step by step instructions, and a demonstration video...
2007-06-10 09:58:53 · answer #1 · answered by spike missing debra m 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't . There is no alternative for Malaki having the same merits of Malaki's .
1- Malaki is wise and moderate and he knows the backgrounds of all sectors of the people .
2- Any new alternative will face much more voilence and riots because taking out Malaki will encourage the plotters to be more active and more offensive .
3- Iraq is not prepared for a secular leader because of the strong hold of clerks of different doctorines and religions .
4- Bush himself does not know how to find the solution to this trapping situation he finds himself in . AS a result I don't thik he is prone to take out Malaki as the late Kenedy did .
2007-06-10 17:03:20 · answer #2 · answered by mohammadnaima 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no Bush is not going to pull him out over something that insignificant in the long run. What Diem was doing was much worse.
2007-06-13 09:48:59 · answer #3 · answered by gerafalop 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋