The same old same old..........
"We probably can do it from the air"
AND THEN WHAT???????? IRAN FORETS ALL ABOUT IT???????????????????
We will suffer 60% casualties against Iran all BECAUSE REPUBLICANS REFUSE TO USE PROPER DIPLOMATIC MEENS!!!!!
America will plunge into civil war when our army is destroyed in Iran or SYRIA!!!!!!!!
2007-06-10 03:50:39 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Scary thought, for sure!!! It appears the 'pre-war' press game is beginning. I am so disappointed that Lieberman started it. He was almost an icon when he switched to independent. Who will be the next one to say attack Iran - McCain?
This war will just keep expanding until there we vote in a new administration. There is no way to stop it!
I hope we are still around...
2007-06-10 04:05:35 · answer #1 · answered by nanny 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Can't trust a Jew. They all go right wing. Filthy scum that destroys the world. No one listens. People love the god of the jews. Why? The filth and garbage that apparently has been given some chosen land for some chosen people. Don't you understand! We're not those people and that pathetic and meaningless patch of land is not ours. The jews have been given the whole World to do as they please. They control the lives of humanity. And they don't care. "Oh, let's put some money into the Arts. That's a good tax dodge. One that we set up. No money to the disadvantaged, just for us. And we get our names onto a lot of plaques. Yes we are ugly but we have the power! We are born jews and we own you, you stupid slaves.
By the way Joe C, why does stinking filth like you always report me when I never report stinking filth like you?
2007-06-10 04:34:51 · answer #2 · answered by Watcher 465 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Joe Lieberman is still a Democrat.
He does not have the power to order an attack on Iran.
Saying what we COULD do is not the same thing as doing it. In fact it is often part of the diplomatic process; letting an adversary know that there are hawks in the government who could gain more power if the adversary doesn't adjust its actions to be less threatening to us. Many countries play that game while trying to negotiate, and war usually does not result from such "saber rattling". I certainly hope not.
Who says we will suffer 60% casualties against Iran and Syria? Iran and Syria, perhaps?
You are right to be concerned, but wrong to overstate your case.
http://www.yaktivist.com
Polite Discussion, Respectful Disagreements regarding nonlethal alternatives to Abortion, Death Penalty, Lethal Weapons.
2007-06-10 04:01:25 · answer #3 · answered by Yaktivistdotcom 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
they say he left Congress to pass into television. don't get me incorrect, he's a amazing flesh presser, if he sticks with it. He did no longer pass away to pass into television, there became so lots extra happening. i'm confident some libs with money will root all of it out. we will see. enable's say I stay in a coastal city interior the Florida panhandle and consistent with possibility worked in a position that dealt with a family members member of his very almost daily.
2016-10-07 05:41:10 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, and when we go into a civil war I bet you will be on the front line. People like you just need to chill out and be glad you don't live in Iran or Iraq. Be thankful and proud of the country you live in!
2007-06-10 03:56:44 · answer #5 · answered by K M 1 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Way to go Joe! The ONLY Dem with a backbone since good old Zell retired...
And yes, he may have won on an "independent" ticket, but he's still... A DEM!
Edit:
I'm still pretty new around here and haven't reported anybody, but wouldn't PinkFlamingo's comment be considered abuse?
2007-06-10 04:23:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well it's pearls before swines. Face the nation :"When has a president ever had good relations with congress?" Editorially lame commentary.
For the record I think we should wait until the isotopes from a dirty bomb are linked to their reactor. NOT!!!
This is one issue not to mess up on. If iran was earnest in developing nuclear power for peaceful purposes, it would allow and encourage all sorts of inspection. Instead it wants secrecy. Goes to show intent.
2007-06-10 04:04:29 · answer #7 · answered by Wonka 5 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Diplomatic "meens ?" What the" H " is a MEEN? pinko flaming "o", abuse? Yeap!
2007-06-10 04:41:36 · answer #8 · answered by Billy TK 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I actually watched it and was not at all surprised to see a Bushco puppet. I guess they needed a replacement for McCain as war spokesperson. Libermann is an idiot, he went to Iraq, the soldiers all asked him 'when are we going home', he comes back and says the troops are behind the occupation all the way.
Libermann is a sell out - he is a DINO a Democrat in name only. All poltiticians that are bad need to be called on the carpet regardless of their party affiliation.
2007-06-10 03:58:55 · answer #9 · answered by citizenjanecitizenjane2 4 · 6⤊ 5⤋
Great for him!
And our country could become imperiled if some clueless Democrats depend upon "proper diplomatic means" in dealing with people who want only to burn us to a crisp.
Lierbmann was kicked out of the stinking rotten Democrat party because he at least has one ounce of sense, not fulfilling the 100 per cent rottenness and stupidity requirement!
Talk about intolerance! That's liberal hypocrisy at it's finest!
2007-06-10 03:53:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 5⤋