English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The majority of people haven't been satisfied with the executive branch of the government for a few decades. The leading candidates for 08 don't seem much different.
Maybe we should consider outsourcing the presidency to a private management firm. At least the accountability might improve.
Or perhaps, we should consider sending the job overseas and get it done cheaper.

2007-06-10 03:25:50 · 6 answers · asked by Perplexed Bob 5 in Politics & Government Politics

6 answers

It already is Via Corporate and Israeli interests.
You advocate in fact EXACTLY what has already been done.
Private enterprise has high- jacked our Nations highest office.

What of the principal of equality and equal opportunity for all in this the 21st century? This much cherished ideal found in the country's founding documents is made into a mockery as permanent prosperity for the rich is enshrined through congressional legislation, i.e., tax cuts, inheritance tax elimination, bankruptcy laws, so-called energy policy, and the legal recognition of corporations as being de facto persons. The workers, meanwhile, are subjugated by minimum and low paying service sector employment with decreased rights and benefits, often without health insurance. Post-modern capitalism has turned life in the United States into neo-feudalism with the token figurehead noble, the president, serving the corporate masters of war. The monarchy may not look like traditional kings, yet it exists within the community of billionaire and multi-millionaire power brokers that make foreign and domestic policy decisions. The chains of 16th century feudalism have morphed into a 21st century version where slaves without chains hustle to make ends meet as the nobility dines on the world's carved up resources.

In the feudal times of the Middle Ages, witches were blamed for many ills within society. There were the so-called Middles Ages "bitches" and other heretics. There was Christine de Pisan, the abbess and musician Hildegard of Bingen, and the patron of the arts Eleanor of Aquitaine. There were the scientific thinkers persecuted by those they threatened with their knowledge, Copernicus, Galileo, et al. The nobles accused these people of treasonous behavior diverting attention away from themselves. They blamed, stigmatized, and summarily prosecuted anyone opposing them. Today's nobles blame "feminazis", gays, dissidents, environmentalists, peace and social justice activists, disabilities rights advocates, anti-imperialists, and war protestors, diverting attention away from the regime's heinous failures. Everyone not in agreement with the US regime is castigated as a "traitor" in the attempts at drawing the spotlight away from its corruption and malfeasance.

Today's lords, as in feudal times, have co-opted the churches in controlling the masses. This symbiotic relationship between State and Church is mutually advantageous. The more things change throughout history, the more they remain the same. The more knowledge that humanity acquires, the further backward the populace goes. The poorer people become, the less they know, or care to know. Caring less makes the prospect of taking control away from the masters less probable. We, the people, have become, we, the serfs. We will remain serfs as long as income is taxed instead of wealth, and as long as workers are willing to contribute their sons and daughters to die fighting for the lies and profits of the rich. The yoke of oppression is alive and well within US capitalism, for it and feudalism, are the same.

2007-06-10 03:29:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Oh yes, perhaps we can pay for a dictator and just which one of our 301 million people will get to choose who this person is? Would we all get to interview the person, negotiate the contract and be signers? Should we leave it up to the like of say Nancy Pelosi or Murtha who are crooks themselves?

2007-06-10 03:33:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The best option in the scenario you suggest would be for exchange of the presidents between USA and Russia!

2007-06-10 03:29:12 · answer #3 · answered by Sami V 7 · 2 1

o sure that will really make the globalists happy. how about this. americans all get together start studing and critiqueing their government more then we will be educated enough to demand better leader ship.

2007-06-10 03:48:03 · answer #4 · answered by wedjb 6 · 1 0

I thought we already have? To the Radical republican anti-democracy Limaugh-Hannity-Coulter axis of propaganda.

2007-06-10 03:30:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

we have. that's where Halli-Burton comes in...lol

2007-06-10 03:42:37 · answer #6 · answered by ὀκτάπους 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers