In the name Jerry Falwell (God Rest His Soul) may his legacy live in fighting terrorism. He is dancing in the clouds now with his banjo and eating sunday fried chicken. "Jerry we love ya man"may our crusade continue with our Massiah GWB!!!!
God Bless Christian America
2007-06-10 03:40:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The conflict isn't over yet, which potential the winner continues to be unknown. Like maximum wars, some battles are gained; some battles are lost. well-known it would be honest to declare that Bush is slightly forward interior the conflict on terror. unquestionably Osama Bin weighted down has made little progression on his substantial objective, which became the overthrow of corrupt governments interior the Mid-East to get replaced by making use of the caliphate spanning the finished Ottoman Empire of old. There at the instant are 2 fledgling democracies in Iraq and Afghanistan that are no longer out of the woods yet, yet are reason for tempered optimism. The Sunnis brutally suppressed the Shiite in Iraq for some years so it is going to take a little time for the revenge and counter revenge to play out. yet maximum critically, Bush has secured coorperation from the two the Saudis and the Pakistanis in this conflict on terrorists. simply by fact Bush's objective has been containment, it ought to be judged a achievement. simply by fact OBL's objective became growth and restructuring of the political map of the mid east it ought to be judged a failure. of direction the techniques and execution of the yankee militia marketing campaign would have been crisper. The acsendency of Iran as a hegemonic potential interior the area is complicated. yet on an identical time the conflict is being gained. although, it incredibly isn't any longer being gained as rapidly simply by fact the U. S. elctorate want, and it incredibly isn't any longer being gained devoid of casualties, so the Bush adminsitration has attracted distinctive complaint. yet is Bush prevailing the conflict on terror: sure he's!
2016-10-07 05:39:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Exaggerated numbers there on the Iraqi dead.....I believe the official toll is much lower. The rest is true though.......freedom and such.
How many Iraqis would have died if we weren't there? Isn't everyone saying this is a civil war? Do you claim that we are responsible for all the dead?
2007-06-10 03:25:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by justin b 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can thank Iran for the 658,500 dead.
Iran has been supporting the Shi'a insurgency, especially the Mahdi army under Muqtada al-Sadr, from the getgo. They supply bombs which are used to create IED's that kill the majority of civilians and soldiers. Also, the Revolutionary Guard of Iran, under the "wise and peaceful" Ayatollah Khomenai supplies the Iraq insurgents with EFP's, that shoot molten copper through armor to kill our brave american soldiers. This same revolutionary guard also trains insurgents in combat. Praise Bush for removing the brutal police state of Saddam that killed, tortured, raped, and maimed millions, often with the help of mustard and sarin gas(wmd's), blame Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Ayatollah Khomenai for keeping the war going.
2007-06-10 03:22:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Serpico7 5
·
3⤊
3⤋
655,000 terrorists and future terrorists down but millions to go.
2007-06-10 03:29:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Goofy.
2007-06-10 03:19:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, we are provided Iraqis with great live fire terrorist training grounds against the US troops.
2007-06-10 03:20:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Go back to 7th grade.
2007-06-10 03:21:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
there is that Rosie O'Donnell number again. There is life out side of moveon.org propaganda. I hope you will find it some day.
2007-06-10 03:21:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Working Stiff 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
congratulations Bush ! he is great president of the US
2007-06-10 03:19:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋