English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Like, say, two balls of lead? Pb, by the way, has a 2.33 electronegativity which is quite enormous, and it is the heaviest chemically stable element (i.e. the one which owns the biggest amount of electrons). It would then be the most effective element to test electronegativity.

Is that alone enough to make two balls move a bit?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronegativity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_experiment

2007-06-10 02:12:54 · 3 answers · asked by Roy Nicolas 5 in Science & Mathematics Chemistry

?
No news good news.
I guess it does then.

2007-06-10 03:05:09 · update #1

Thanks but...
"Electronegativity is a chemical property which describes the power of an atom (or, more rarely, a functional group) to attract electrons towards itself." --- Wiki.

And yes, Fluor is the most electronegative, thus not surprisingly among the most reactive chemicals, perhaps the most.

Chlore is similar to fluor in that way and is almost just as reactive. Like Oxygen, Carbon, Nitro, Sulfur, Brome and Iode.

The most electronegative elements are obviously the most prone to unite with others (and by that occasion destroy subtances, clean, etc). They don't even stay united because of electronegativy (in fact they will switch as soon as a better partner comes).

That property is like chemical charisma if i understand well. So your coffee answer does not change my point of view. Total lead could attract total lead as a pure & top electronegative element. Especially if it's a ball, because geometry helps there.

2007-06-10 05:12:09 · update #2

I apologize. Both of you are right, i'm sure ---> electronegativity is related to attraction between atoms, and plays a part in chemical components like HCl and Cl2, O2, CH4. It's therefore a kind of force, as its purpose is to put atoms together.

Therefore i still believe that electronegativity alone can set a constant like G in the head of Cavendish. (this is as discrete as 6.67 × 10−11 N m^2/kg^2).

2007-06-10 12:15:21 · update #3

3 answers

No, electronegativity is a measure of something different than what you're imagining. In a sense, it's a measure of how much electrons in a covalent bond "like" to spend time around that atom. For example, the electronegativities of H and F are about 2.1 and 4, respectively. When H and F form a covalent bond by sharing electrons (forming the molecule HF in the process), the bonding electrons will tend to spend more time around F than H because of its higher electronegativity value. Because electrons are negatively charged, this makes the fluorine end of HF slightly negatively charged and the hydrogen end slightly positive (since bonding electrons are spending a little less time there).

Electronegativity isn't a measure of how attracted one substance may be to another substance...that's what you seem to be implying in your question.

Finally, on the most common electronegativity scale, values tend to range from about 0.7 to 4.0. Fluorine is the element with the greatest electronegativity value; lead's value of 2.33 isn't particularly high or low.

Hope this helps...

2007-06-10 03:26:17 · answer #1 · answered by ihatedecaf 3 · 1 0

"We have been monogamous, however, we've never had anal sex and only mutually masturbate or have quick twice a month." Are you serious? Is this a joke? You've had chicken cooked that way for two years? No wonder you two are imploding. I hate to be blunt. A jerk off buddy is not good enough and it is not healthy. Do you two have oral sex? You mentioned a quick twice a month. Is that what you call a quick? One or both of you has a serious hangup about sex. I am surprised you two lasted as long as you have. If you have the hangup then you'll carry this into the next guy and the next guy and the next. You mentioned you are 22 and he is 12 years older. So, he is 34. He should be firing sex wise without the need for Viagra or any other drugs. He should be horny as hell. God knows I was at 34 and still am at 45. I am not bragging by the way. What I am saying is sex drive can keep smoking year after year. So, the way I see it is maybe you two both need to see a therapist and work out this sex problem. Perhaps if you two try some new things in the sack you'll rediscover great intimacy, passion and love for each other. Usually when guys are resistant to trying normal things in bed then one of two things is going on: 1. Internalized homophobia is running the show. 2. A very bad experience in the past with a certain kind of sex act has soured the idea of ever doing it again.

2016-05-21 06:27:01 · answer #2 · answered by sherrill 3 · 0 0

Ok buddy...you're so damn defiant here. The answerer above is correct in what he is saying....and you're not. Trust me, go take a chemistry degree or become more well versed in what you are talking about.

2007-06-10 08:29:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers