English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The 1st quadrant area bound by y=x^2 and y=x+2 is revolved around the vertical axis. What is the volume generated?

2007-06-09 17:34:04 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

Dr. D, shouldn't dV = pi*[y-(y-2)]^2dy ???

2007-06-09 17:51:13 · update #1

Dr. D, I stand corrected. Thanks, sweet2water.

2007-06-09 18:04:19 · update #2

4 answers

Since you're revolving around the y axis, you need to integrate
π*x^2*dy between y = 0 and y = 4.
The curves intersect at (2,4).

Integral of π * [y - (y-2)^2]*dy
= π *[y^2/2 - (y-2)^3 / 3]
= π * [8 - (8/3 + 8/3)]
= 8π/3

2007-06-09 17:39:33 · answer #1 · answered by Dr D 7 · 1 0

You can solve this problem by first finding the point of intersection between the two curves to find your limits. Area will be bound between the points x=0 and x=2. The formula to find volume of revolution is the integral from a to b of 2πx times (x+2-x^2)dx. The term in parentheses represents the height of the cross section at any point x (basically the difference beween the two functions, being careful to put the more positive function first). When you evaluate your integral, you get 2π[(x^3)/3+x^2-(x^4)/4] evaluated between 0 and 2. Your final answer is 16π/3.

Edit: The method of revolution mentioned by Dr D does not work. The problem states that the area has to be first quadrant only. Yet the function y = x+2 enters the second quadrant below y = 2. Therefore your limits will only work between y = 2 and y = 4. Between y = 0 and y = 2, you have to use the function x = 0 as your left bound. I find my method simpler and accurate.

2007-06-09 17:56:17 · answer #2 · answered by Jeff 3 · 0 0

do exactly dimensional conversion by technique of dividing 40 5 g by technique of two.sixty seven g/ml the gram contraptions cancel. you're left with sixteen.80 5 mL this is .001 L multiply those 2 to get the quantity of liters, 0.016L.

2016-12-12 16:44:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Inday, the good doctor is correct: it's the difference of the squares, not the square of the difference.

2007-06-09 18:01:17 · answer #4 · answered by sweetwater 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers