The 2007 Belmont Stakes result has no bearing on the 2008 Presidential election. However, the Republican debates have more horses @$$es (10) than the Belmont did (7)!
2007-06-09 16:21:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
Not really. According to what you've written, it will be another 100 years before a female horse can win again.
2007-06-09 16:35:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. To have implications for Hildabeast, the filly would have had to win running backwards as that is the end of a horse she resembles.
2007-06-09 16:27:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
No but the hildabeast will be cleaning the stable to dig
up some horsesh*t to throw at the public
2007-06-09 16:35:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by justgetitright 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, but it sure bodes well for the owners of Rags to Riches!
2007-06-09 16:17:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
I can see the horse analogy. an *** is close to a horse, but A filly is a female.
2007-06-09 16:24:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
haha yeah definitely not.
Hillary will never win the presidency because she's such a ....
liberals act on emotions
conservatives act on logic
you do the math
2007-06-09 16:20:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by I run... 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Hillary is a gelding.
2007-06-09 16:16:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
Hillary is not a female horse...she is a female DOG
2007-06-09 16:14:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
2⤋
Maybe, they do look a lot alike.
2007-06-09 16:24:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Brian 7
·
2⤊
1⤋