Here's a few hard questions for you to face:
http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/review.html
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons
2007-06-09 15:52:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
4⤋
he's FOS on the grounds that I grew up below JFK i comprehend for a certainty that B-747's ( presented January 22, 1970 with Pan Am ) and DC-10s (creation August 5, 1971 with American airways ) have been in provider earlier the WTC replaced into executed> The North Tower (a million) replaced into executed in December 1972 and the South Tower (2) replaced into finished in July 1973. the extensive-unfold attitude into LGA landing to the south took you over the Verrazano -Narrows -Bridge, up the East River at approximately one hundred seventy kts and at an altitude of approximately 1800' AGL which positioned the Brooklyn Bridge below you and the tops of the twin Towers < 1mile west and seven hundred ' below your left wing. Airspeed is substantial to comprehend-how this subject b/c in the NYC TRACON there's a strictly enforced do not exceed airspeed of 250 kts below 10,000' MSL and realistically all people flying in that environment at those altitudes is flying slower than that . subsequently the plane that hit the twin Tower hit them at a velocity that no-one would have estimated The tension of an effect is predicated on 2 issues How enormous some thing is how briskly that is shifting some thing incredibly small yet shifting incredibly speedy can grant the comparable volume of effect that some thing incredibly great and shifting incredibly sluggish can At equivalent lots a extreme velocity merchandise will grant extra tension at effect than a low velocity merchandise certainty : this in many situations noted "certainty" is punctiliously beside the point to this communicate "certainty: No skyscraper has EVER collapsed from hearth.......... and we've had some incredibly nasty fires over the years, alongside with the Windsor development in Madrid Spain that's plenty warmer and lots larger than the WTC." Why ? because of the fact no skyscrapers have been ever geared up like the twin Towers of the WTC have been which had no vertical inner structural steel columns to assist the flooring above as a count of certainty the absence of any vertical inner structural steel columns -that would compromise useful place of work area - replaced into between the effective factors that the Port Authority made whilst the marketed the development to potential tenants So on 9/eleven whilst all of that burning jet weakened the horizontal steel contributors and brought about the flooring to sag , the burden replaced into desperately searching for some thing below it to assist it ( like vertical inner structural steel columns) and because there wasn't something there , the flooring pancaked
2016-11-09 23:16:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by chatan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chuckle, I'm an engineer, you are not going to like this but: The towers were built on the cage method of beam supports,
meaning all the support beams were on the outside. When the planes hit they immediately took out 1/4 of the supports and the towers held at this point. Good design, but the flame weakened the remaining supports to the point that the remaining beams spread & allowed the floor to drop. A wood fire is also capable of heating steel to the point it will bend and those that cite jet fuel & building material as insuffecient to considerably weaken the structure are simply not using their heads. Once a floor impacted the one beneath it, that floor too dropped & a cascading effect followed. Note that the building fell from the top down & not from the bottom down as an explosively imploded building does.
I love a conspiricy story as much as anyone, but wish people would spend more time making them believable.
Ed
2007-06-09 16:29:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
T H R E E buildings fell. !!
ONE fire engin was used to stop the pentagon fire. A fire that DID NOT burn up books or a computer 30 feet away.
I saw on a website guys talking--one said the pentagon hole was 16' feet wide--the other said 60' wide.
I said. "even my dumb ash can figure this out." And I did.
any other dumb ash can too--and should--unless, they DONT want the truth.
Who are the real terriorist you ask. Who murdered 3k Americans? Was it a caveman? Or--other Americans?
If you can decipher the diff in 16' and 60' (and you can, im sorry, but you can) you will know--and you will a sickness in your stomach. Thats when you know -you know.
2007-06-09 16:06:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Son, no one is listening to the amateurs anymore on this.
The official reports are out, the engineers have spoken (you clearly haven't read them, not as an insult, but based upon your main idea), and no one is interesting in digging through and advertising all our classified national secrets to our enemies on a witch hunt.
We faced the hard questions. We will again, of course. We just need more than conspiracy theory and amateurs (like professors with no training in the field they are arguing about) to make us wish to spend our time on these things.
Posts that clearly show no knowledge of what the official reports and engineering background or knowledge don't help your goals. Do a little research, get us some facts, come back.
Keep speaking up, regardless. That's what makes us strong.
2007-06-09 15:58:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
911 was planned and carried out by the American government.. people you need to wake up... with every occurrence of 911.. there is a ? attached...
tower 1, 2 and 7 all fell at free fall speed... IMPOSSIBLE !! for that to occur at free fall speed... PEOPLE WAKE UP!!
tower 7... NO PLANE!! yet it fell in a tidy pile right into it's own basement... CLASSIC CD...
pentagon.. another vast array of unbelievable explanations put forth by the government...
flight 93... JUST A HOLE IN THE GROUND... NO PLANE... NO LUGGAGE.. NO BODIES....
ANYONE WHO BELIEVES THE OFFICIAL CONSPIRACY THEORY PUT FORTH BY THE 911 COMMISSION IS SERIOUSLY DILUTING THEMSELVES...
2007-06-10 05:54:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by peace 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Ahhhh....but you see, the impact of those planes was so hard that it actually blew the fire proofing they used to spray on those steel support beams right off. You didn't see any fires? I did, amazing isn't it? I've got some great links for you to do the research you need to so you can answer those "hard questiuons" that you are asking, provided, of course, that you actually want to "wake up" and have them answered even though they won't say what you want to hear.
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/09/nova-on-911.html
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/wtc/above.html
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/transcripts/2907_wtc.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/experts/articles/eagar_nova/nova_eagar1.html
2007-06-09 16:02:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Perhaps you should do a little research before making such statements. The reason so many victims were never found is that they were incinerated in the fires caused by burning jet fuel. It was like cremation with peoples ashes mixed with other debris. As I said, you won't look so ignorant if you get your facts straight first. I'm speaking as someone who suffered a loss that day.
2007-06-09 17:09:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Penguin_Bob 7
·
0⤊
4⤋
Where'd all the smoke come from if there were no fires? Sure was a lot of smoke. Oh, and steel does not "solidify in a flash" when it is cooled, that's craziness. Like any other heavy metal, it slowly cools over long periods of time once taken away from heat.
2007-06-09 15:52:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by justin b 4
·
5⤊
4⤋
looks like Peace has pretty much said what I wanted to say. So I will reiterate what he said.
bush is a creep a.k.a. demon child.
people need to wake up!
2007-06-10 09:02:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, the anthrax was not connected to 9/11.
Were you there when the planes hit?
Did you see the fires in person.
There were only so many cameras there.
Sure, there are many unanswered questions.
2007-06-09 15:51:00
·
answer #11
·
answered by zombi86 6
·
6⤊
3⤋