2007-06-09 10:42:41 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
A Muslim! Being a Muslim is not against the law, and most have nothing to do with the radical wing!
Bush on the other hand, is a Fascist!
I would vote for anyone other than Busjh!
2007-06-09 10:47:54 · answer #1 · answered by cantcu 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
George Bush
2007-06-09 13:04:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lets see if I understand your question. By design your question implies that all Muslims are unbinding violent killers without moral or ethical standards. That they will never conform to living in a free thinking, choice based society that would rather live in peace with their neighbors. Forced religious conversions and mass killings are the political weapons most preferred. If I am correct in my assumptions that IS what you imply than I don’t see much of a difference between Bush and your so called definition of who or what a Muslim is.
By the way I do not think all Muslims are violent, serving 18 months in the gulf taught me that.
2007-06-09 14:23:21 · answer #3 · answered by phule_poet 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you look at all of the terrorist acts you generally find a Muslim. Let me see.
First, I would have liked to vote for a strong, coherant leader. (none available,)
Second, I voted for Bush because, compared to the other choices he was head and shoulders above Gore and Kerry.
Dead, Dead last I would not have voted for a misguided, murderous, Muslim terrorist. Those people have vowed to Kill us. They capture our troops and then murder them. They pay no attention to such things as the Geneva Convention. We are critisized for detaining prisones, feeding them, providing them with the Koran, etc. but it seems to be allright for a Muslim to behead a defenseless captive.
2007-06-09 12:46:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That depends who the Muslim is. There's nothing wrong with being a Muslim, but it's hard to do any worse than Bush.
2007-06-09 10:54:03 · answer #5 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
George Bush for a third term,
"not all muslims are terrorists but all terrorists are muslim"
2007-06-09 13:57:55 · answer #6 · answered by fade_2_black 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Muslim if he was a better candidate. Its not hard to be better than Bush so why not? Separation from church and state. Someone like Obama would be a thousand times better than Bush.
2007-06-09 10:54:19 · answer #7 · answered by wali_lundi 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i think of i might vote McCain for the tax cuts, and because Bush has been a awful spender in the previous. yet, in comparison to a pair different individuals, i think of he did ok. you comprehend, 2 thirds of the government have been on the opposing party in the time of his presidency. wait... so which you purely vote Obama because of the fact he's African American?
2016-11-09 22:44:12 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George Bush all the way.
2007-06-09 10:45:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I'd vote for a pig before voting for a Muslim. Pigs are at least useful.
2007-06-09 12:34:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋