In the United States it seems we have moved further away from socialism, which is a good thing in some aspects, in others maybe not so.
If only we could develop a more libertarian society where we wouldn't need socialism (government controls) and people would be responsible for their individual well being as well as the good of society in whole. Of couse, I don't know of any country called Utopia as of yet.
2007-06-09 09:09:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by MaryCheneysAccessory 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
This is really funny.
I like how the conservatives always think the liberals are taking over and the liberals always think the conservatives are.
TIME FOR A WAKE UP CALL.
In the United States of America, we are regulated by laws, societal customs, and the media.
Since PLENTY of media outlets lean toward a more liberal stance on issues (and the only "conservative" media force out there is FOX, which most Americans don't uniformly support, or even widely support, by the way) and since PLENTY of political correctness, affirmative action, and quota regulations are pretty evident in the US, liberal thought does have a hold on American thought and action.
So does conservative thought, particularly in a number of social customs like marriage. In no way, however, is American society owned completely by the left or the right, not by a long shot. It may be easy for outside commentators who don't actually LIVE in America to make judgment calls, but the situation to an AMERICAN doesn't at all seem to be heading toward fascism or communism.
Socialism is a different story. America has already seen some socialist reforms (SOCIAL security, anyone?). The current generation seems to be somewhat in support of further reforms, but a lot of the kids I talk to disagree with some of the fundamentals of socialism.
Besides, isn't that who we have to focus on to begin with? The 50-60 year olds are going to be out of power VERY soon. We should start looking at the generation that WILL rise to power instead of looking at a snapshot of today.
2007-06-10 10:25:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Robinson0120 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO it is miles away. Think of it this way You are in a car and you are approaching a white brick wall with the word "Socialism" written on it. There are 2 pedels. The gas Pedel is the Democratic and the Green party which argues for the redistribution of wealth and social handouts. Then there is the brake which is the Republican and the Libertarian party which are pro capitalism.
Libertaianism being the brake plus the hand brake and putting the car in reverse at the same time. While Republicans are really weak brake pads that don't do that much to help you stop.
2007-06-09 16:47:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
We may be approaching a Canada-style mixed economy of socialism and capitalism. Only the most fundamental services, such as education and health care, will be publicly funded, but the markets will still be as free as possible without being reckless.
EDIT TO GRAYMALKIN: It already has. http://www.bushflash.com/14.html
2007-06-09 20:06:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rio Madeira 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
the combination of socialism + capitalism produces some of the most economically stable and socially balanced countries in the world
sweden, new zealand, canada, finland, norway, germany, france, UK....
unchecked capitalism = countries where companies wield more power than individuals, and some citizens have too much wealth while others in the same society suffer from lack of basic healthcare and education
2007-06-09 22:07:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Holla H 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, everyone has their hand out and wants the government to give them something. Businesses as much as anyone.
No one, however, wants to put the government or any group in charge of the means of production.
It may not be free enterprise, but it's not socialism.
2007-06-09 16:13:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sarah C 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
How is this a women's studies question? Are you asking it as a man? (Are we men fast approaching socialism?) or are you accusing women of turning to socialism? Do you know what socialism is and its variations? Or are you one who argues that any change is "socialistic"? Or are you simply being anti-social by posting it here?
2007-06-09 16:25:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Orv 3
·
4⤊
2⤋
No you are fast approaching a overt dictatorship vs the covert one you are pleasantly living in.
2007-06-09 16:19:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
I agreed with Juan Fran$$$ answer - a Corporate society. I don't like it. For the first time in my life I am starting to be concerned about criticizing the government.
2007-06-09 16:29:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sam 2
·
4⤊
2⤋
No! More like a Corporate dictatorship with the big Corporations running the country by proxy.
2007-06-09 16:18:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by JUAN FRAN$$$ 7
·
5⤊
2⤋