2007-06-09 08:09:46 · 6 answers · asked by beygi 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
That is one strange question if I ever saw one...
What do you mean: that action implies reaction?
You cannot have one without the other. No reaction, no action. No action, no motion.
2007-06-09 08:14:38 · answer #1 · answered by Vincent G 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If Newton's mother and father hadn't moved, there would be no "Newton's" laws. So, no, we do not need a formal description of motion to be able to move,. However factors that do govern how we move can be described, but movement is not dependent on who described it, or the description itself.
2007-06-09 08:23:44 · answer #2 · answered by tinkertailorcandlestickmaker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
possibly, but I think we'll have to find a way to break through to other deminsions, but then again other Ds can't exist without the first 4. so, I think we will always have a tie to Newtonian physics.
btw newton had 3 major laws
2007-06-09 09:11:01 · answer #3 · answered by Mercury 2010 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure. You can find plenty of celestial bodies not aware of that law and still moving...you can find people not aware of it and still moving.
2007-06-09 08:37:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but it's against the law, so I'd advise against.
2007-06-09 11:04:57 · answer #5 · answered by Dr. R 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES. The EM drive.
2016-11-22 09:35:41 · answer #6 · answered by Ranjan 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋