This Mulatto Man says he has the right to Bash the african american race? umm wtf?

Question

similar races, but different
he has no right, no one has the right

wouldn't it be racist if i bashed mulattos? why can he bash african americans? am i the only one who sees how he is mistaken?

http://answers.yahoo.com/my/profile;_ylc=X3oDMTBxZjVlc3FkBF9TAwRzZWMDdXNyX3VzcgRzbGsDc2VuZGVy?show=e95c1e0e0ee652ade5fd8fec476ac4e7aa
this guy is crazy if he thinks that

i know, but it is easier than typingn "black and white" and less confusing

Answer 1

.

The individual you have described is very
wrong, for many reasons, which include --
but are certainly not limited to -- the following:

Reason #1)

He has a very bigoted worldview and bigotry is wrong.

Reason #2)

The 'Ethnic' group currently referred to by the term of
'African-Americans' (AAs) is *not* a "Race" group.


Our society really needs to try to begin to understand that
the 'African-American' (AA) 'Ethnic' group is *not* the
same group as the ’Black American' (BA) 'Race' group --
that the two (2) terms are *not* synonymous and that the
two (2) terms should *not* be used inter-changeably.

We are *not* speaking of ‘semantics’ here – but rather
– the BAs & AAs are two different groups of people.

The AAs are the (largely Mixed-Race) ETHNIC group.

The BAs are the (Mono-Raced) RACE group.

As confusing as it seems -- the U.S. government
[due to racism & wanting to stigmatize the part
of their lineage that was from Africa which, by
the way, is only one part of their lineage] ---

has labeled those individuals who are the known
"descendents of the survivors" of the system of
chattel-slavery found in the USA as being AAs
(the hyphen is used in reference to acknowledging
the fact that most of them are Mixed-Race,
with African & non-African blood lines)

AND

has labeled those people who are "volitional immigrants"
who are directly from places such as the continent of
African, the West Indies, etc. -- as being BAs
(with the word 'Black' used in reference to acknowledging
the fact that they are of a Mono-racial full-Black lineage).

In addition, it should also be remembered that – although
some AAs adhere to a socio-political ‘identity’ that is
often described by the slang term of “black”—the AAs
are actually *not* a "Race" group at all -- but rather
they *are* a largely Mixed-Race 'Ethnic' group
(and the socio-political ‘identity’ that a person chooses
*does not* change their racially-mixed ancestral lineage).

Most (+70%) of the people born to two (2) parents who
are of the AA ‘Ethnic’ group are are of a Multi-Racially
‘Mixed’ (MGM) lineage – while the people to two (2)
parents who are of the BA ‘Racial’ group – on the
other hand – are of a Mono-Racially ‘Black’ lineage.

There is a big difference between a largely Multi-racial
'Ethnic' group and between a Mono-racial 'Race group.

In addition, there is also a big difference between
one's socio-political 'identity' (ex. "black") and
one's ancestral racial 'lineage' (ex. 'Mixed').

Just because a person adheres to a given
socio-political 'identity' does *not* change
the composition of their ancestral 'lineage'.

Also -- the 'One-Drop' Rule (the false teaching that
'any amount' of Black ancestral lineage make a
person "full black") is nothing more than pure-racism.

The racist 'One-Drop Rule' (used only by the United
States government, by the way) was created during
the antebellum, chattel-slavery era by White racial
supremacist in order to get people to believe the false
racist myth that the so-called White "race" was "pure"
and to falsely view the Black "racial" admixture
(even the slightest amount) within someone's
ancestral lineage as being "tainted".

To embrace the 'One-Drop Rule' is the equivalent of BOTH
embracing "racism" and embracing the false teaching
that a Mixed-Race person's Black lineage is "tainted".

My advice is that a non-Racist should *not* embrace
the concept of the 'One-Drop Rule' -- as "Black blood"
is *not* "tainted" -- and should never be perceived
or embraced as being so (not even in the
name of so-called "pride" and "unity").

In addition, legally-speaking, attempted forcible
application of the racist 'One-Drop Rule' -- against
any individual or group -- was made illegal and ruled
as unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court
in 1967 via the case of 'Loving vs. The State of Virginia'.

Through the 'Loving vs. Virginia' case, the U.S.
Supreme Court, ruled against both all of the laws
banning Interracial marriage -- and -- also ruled
that any so-called law which forcibly applied the
'One Drop Rule' -- was racist, discriminatory,
illegal, unconstitutional, and non-enforcible.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1402

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1400

Related Links:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MGM-Mixed
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FGM-Mixed

------------------------PLEASE NOTE---------------------

--- Dr. Luigi Caveli-Sforza, who is the Executive
Director of the Human Genome Project and the
world's foremost authority on human genetics
has both tested and proven that more that 70%
of all AAs have a full ancestral lineage which
consists of +20-30% White / European and
more than +25% Amerindian bloodlines.

--- That means that the 'average' (+70%) person
born to two (2) parents who are both members
of the AA Ethnic group actually has slightly
less than 50% Black / African blood lineage
found in his or her full-ancestral lineage.

For more information -- see supporting links listed below:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1399
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1032
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1034
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/991
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1570
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/1573

--------------------------- ADDED NOTE ---------------------

It should also be noted that -- contrary to popular belief and
myth spread among many groups who are not educated or
informed on the whole topic -- it was not the group that is
currently being referred to as being the African-Americans
(AAs) -- who chose this term for them -- but rather --
like so many of the other terms used to describe
them -- this term was also implemented by
the United States federal government
(starting with the 1990 United
States 'Census Bureau' Forms).

If a person insists on spreading the 'myth' that it was the
AAs who chose this term for themselves -- it is clearly
indicative of the fact that they have never even once
actually studied the entire topic and are simply basing
their comments on assumption-based ignorance --
rather than objective facts and empirical evidence.

.

Answer 2

I did not bash any race. This woman claims I did simply because she is a racist and cannot see it even though it has been presented to her quite clearly. I am quite confident that if I had made a comment implying that black women were somehow superior to white women, she would have praised me.

Furthermore, I am not offended by the term mulatto, half-breed, oreo, zebra, or anything else describing my mixed ethnicity. Usually, I find humor in it... because I am not insecure.

Also, isn't it a violation of Yahoo's terms of service to single out a person for the purpose of bashing them? Ha! Bashing. How ironic.

Answer 3

the term mulatto is not racist. my great grandfather was mulatto. He got shot for being part black so if he can get shot for being black when he was mulatto then the Mulatto Man shouldn't be bashing African Americans. That's ttly racist just cuz he doesn't like thier color or whatever. Plus kuntakintabiglips not many blacks want to kill whites. Its just the ones that live in bad areas where they grow up with bad situations in segregated neighborhoods where whites kill blacks too.

Answer 4

Well honestly I consider the mammoth majority of triumphant Black guys nonetheless do decide on Black females it is simply that we pay attention of those marrying White females extra so it sort of feels like plenty. But you're correct, in that it does look triumphant Black guys on a bigger than normal opt for non-Black females. And usually that is approximately having a popularity image. There are a few idiots available in the market that considering have a blonde to your arm method you have got formally "arrived". These are not the sort of guys you desire to be with besides, so I do not cry buckets. (See OJ and Kobe Bryant) And after they succeed in that popularity, there are lots of gold digging White females comfortable to aid them are living out their fable of a White trophy spouse or mistress. BUT usually it is functional logistics. When a person of any race reaches a precise popularity (millionaire popularity) in which precisely can we consider he's going to be residing and placing out? D'uh, the locations filthy wealthy individuals hang around. They will probably be residing in wealthy neighborhoods, going to wealthy bars, gyms, golf equipment, retail outlets, church buildings yada yada yada. And the unhappy reality is, becuase of racism elements, American elite is quite often occupied through a White majority. So except those guys had Black better halves and girlfriends earlier than they grew to be triumphant they're going to be metting long term wivey of their new prime elegance neighborhoods. And probabilities are towards her being something however White. Sometimes they simply fall in love with what is to be had. And if the one factor or the item that's such a lot to be had is White, he could forget that.

Answer 5

Just cuz he bashed you in one of his posts doesn't mean anything. Get over it. It's just the internet & none of us really knows what the other user is truely all about. There are a lot of "made-up" personalites using this site & others like it. Perhaps if you just moved on with your life, this other user might do the same & the "cycle of abuse" might come to a halt for the 2 of you. You call yourself a "debator", yet you want to wipe an opponent off just because you find their words offensive to your own personal taste? That's just silly, in my eyes. What's really goin' on here? Have you considered your options? There are other buttons to use & other categories to explore!

Answer 6

No one has the right to bash any other person or persons for any reason. Ever. Period. You are right on the button with this question!

Answer 7

Better yet everybody needs to be reclassified as Heinz 57 Americans and stop all this racist crap once and for all.

Answer 8

Some people consider the term "mulatto" to be racist.
Mulatto, based on the word "mule," offends many people and is considered as inappropriate as now-discarded terms such as
"half breed."

Answer 9

he is just stupid, he doesn't know who is he. his butt wounld have been a slave to!