and i saw the proofes that it's right and i saw the proofs that it's wrong...... i think it's right .. what about u and why?
2007-06-09 06:33:57 · 4 answers · asked by mhd1995 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
I haven't seen the proofs, but the nature of the universe indicates it should be true. There was a time when forces were not all seperate as they are now. There was likely a time when all forces were combined as one. Yes, I do believe in the BIG TOE (that's what I call it) as being viable given what we know of the universe already.
2007-06-09 06:44:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I haven't seen any proofs that it's wrong yet. It is an interesting theory and It would be amazing if it were true. The incorporation of other dimensions is pretty cool. I would love to know the properties of the graviton and how to manipulate it. The idea that matter is trapped energy is also very interesting. Why is it so easy to manipulate matter but much harder to manipulate forces. We have learned to manipulate some forces but not all. The concept of the space-time metric and how it relates to "c" , I believe is true. What do you think of the implications of this theory in relation to antimatter?
2007-06-09 13:46:31 · answer #2 · answered by misoma5 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are several so called "theories of everything". None has had experimental support so it is meaningless to favour one. The most widely known is string theory, but this is the one with the least experimental support (it has not been in agreement with new observation for almost 20 years), so it is actually not that appealing. My guess is that it is wrong.
2007-06-09 15:31:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Isn't there a theology area for questions such as this one?
The 'Theory of Everything' is a final, 'Grand Unification' of all Physics. But it hasn't been as yet reached. But it's existence (or not) is independent of 'belief' âº
Doug
2007-06-09 13:47:11 · answer #4 · answered by doug_donaghue 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋