English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He could have just donated the money to build a school for the impoverished children in his district.

We understand that he has ambition to go higher in life than just a superstar boxer. He can do a lot of things without going into politics.

Why has he been so naive of his limitations outside boxing?

2007-06-09 05:51:42 · 2 answers · asked by Curious mind 2 in Politics & Government Elections

2 answers

$2 million dollars is a drop in the bucket compared to big government money that can be redirected to meet the same needs. His attempt to run proves he is not limiting himself to boxing. You can't expand your limits without trying.

2007-06-09 12:30:52 · answer #1 · answered by linkus86 7 · 0 0

Pacquiao has stated various situations that he would not have a project with struggling with Shane Mosley, ought to his negotiating team arise with a stable deal. What got here approximately replaced into greater of a company decision somewhat that Pacquiao not desirous to stand sugar shane. And at that particular time, Cotto replaced into the bigger draw than Mosley. And did it not instruct interior the PPV buys? Pacquiao Cotto replaced into the main important PPV adventure of 2009. besides, Cotto replaced into no push over, he had 2 victories merely before Pacquiao. His loss against Margarito remains being doubted because of the fact the plasters have been uncovered. For all all of us understand Mosley could have particularly not overwhelmed a substantial fighter, because of the fact Margarito could have been cheating all alongside, and he did not have the pyschological self assurance whilst he stepped interior the hoop. nevertheless finished credit ought to get carry of for KOing Margarito. by means of the way, didnt mosley lose to Cotto? So if Pacquiao did face Mosley, whats gonna provide up all people from asserting he ducked cotto and went for the guy cotto beat.

2016-11-27 20:00:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers