Is this woman delusional?
2007-06-09 04:40:10 · 11 answers · asked by R8derMike 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19116101/
2007-06-09 04:45:09 · update #1
koalatcomics
If you would have read the source, you would have found she wasn't refering to anything you listed in your hate filled rant.
2007-06-09 07:01:03 · update #2
It goes against a certain National Intelligence Estimate created by that very same Bush Administration that says the war in Iraq is creating more terrorists than it's killing.
2007-06-09 04:44:13 · answer #1 · answered by John S 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Hey liberal and Bush Hater ponder these thoughts
Maybe instead of getting a messing around with a girl I wouldn't have touched in High School, He could have done his JOB and done something about the following Terrorists attacks that happened on his watch.
AS former Military what do I know right? but I am sure that Osama and the boys Attepted to blow up the world Center in 93, I do know They Killed 19 Airman and wounded 300 Airman in 96 at Khobar Towers, I do know, That Osama and the Boys Blew up 2 U.S. Embassy's in Africa in 98, I do know that Osama and the boys Blow a Hole in the U.S..S Cole in 2000. I do know that 3,000 Americans were killed by Osama and the Boys on 9-11, 9-11 took 6 to 8 years to plan and train who was president for 99% of that time? So If we leave and they win, and they gain strengh and more followers, there gonna come fast and hard against us, so if people want to live in a left wing nut world where everything is America's Fault, someday they may realize one morning were fighting these Terrorists for our WAY OF LIFE at least Bush is doing something about it!!!!!!! Heck CLINTON did nothing about it, expect LIE ABOUT HAVING AN AFFAIR WITH A GIRL IN WOULDN'T HAVE TOUCHED IN HIGH SCHOOL, and spent more time worrying about LYING ABOUT scandals like Whitewater, PREJURE, THAN MAYBE he would have taken Bin Laden into custody in 98 when the Sudan was willing to hand him over.
2007-06-09 11:59:12 · answer #2 · answered by dez604 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
BEFORE BUSH TOOK OFFICE (does this sounds safe?)
02/26/93: Al Qaeda plans executes it’s first attack on the World Trade Center Towers. Six are killed and over 1000 are injured.
10/03/93: American soldiers were killed by Al Qaeda backed insurgents in Somalia, and a naked US Army Ranger was dragged through the streets in celebration.
04/19/95: Oklahoma City terrorist attack which at that time, was the worste terrorist attack on US soil and a DIRECT response to the handling of Waco Texas. 168 were killed (inlcuding dozens of children) and over 800 injured.
06/26/96: Militans strike US military barracks with a truck bomb in Saudi Arabia. 19 are killed.
08/07/98: Al Qaeda attacks US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killing 224 and injuring over 5000.
10/12/00: Al Qaeda attacks the USS Cole, murdering 17 sailors.
AND WHILE I'M AT IT..........Occupation of Somalia in 1993-94. Sending troops to Rwanda in July 1994. Invasion of Haiti in September 1994. Invasion of Bosnia in December 1995. Warships sent to maneuver off the coast of China in 1996. Firing of cruise missiles at suspected chemical weapons sites in Iraq in December 1998!
2007-06-09 11:54:52 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If thats true, why was GWB so asleep at the switch on Sept 11 2001?
2007-06-09 11:53:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
She's just what she's always been - a mouthpiece for Bush. I don't think I've ever seen a Secretary of State so useless or with their nose so far up the President's rear end.
2007-06-09 12:08:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nope. It is safer.
Clinton's strategy of inaction may be popular with the liberals, but it sure didn't help prevent 9/11.
2007-06-09 12:21:34 · answer #6 · answered by Sleeck 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Through her "glasses," the world was more dangerous. It's called, as a throw rug in several catalogs says, "Well butter my butt and call me a biscuit...." That's what she's doing for BOTH of them.
2007-06-09 11:49:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wheres' the source? I sure don't believe that she said it unless it was taken out of context.
2007-06-09 11:43:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
A deaf blind woman who tells her opinion about an idiot
2007-06-09 11:44:27 · answer #9 · answered by Tariq E 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
absolutely not...shes dead on...a few examples.
uss cole
clinton...no response
african embassy bombings..
clinton...no response.
first wtc...
clinton no response.
at least six chances to capture or kill bin laden in sudan
clinton no response.
clintons behavior in the white house...
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
THE LIBERAL EXTREMIST ELECTORATE...
NO RESPONSE
second wtc....bush response and no known successfull attack by al qaeda on us soil since.
THATS WHAT SHES REFERRING TO. YOU LOSE ON THIS ONE LIBERAL..HAVE A NICE DAY...LMFAO.
2007-06-09 12:12:20 · answer #10 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋