What is the definition of an allrounder? Is an excellent wicketkeeper batting brilliantly an allrounder?

Answer 1

ALL ROUNDER MEANS IN CRICKET IS BEST BOWLER FIELDER AND BATSMAN BUT IT IS OLD STORY. IN THESE GOOD WICKETKEEPER AND BATSMAN IS ALSO A GOOD ALL ROUNDER.

Answer 2

An allrounder is the one who can both bat and bowl atleast averagely.
Wicketkeeper can never be called an allrounder unless he sometimes lets go of his wicketkeeping and take part in bowling.
An excellent wicketkeeper batting brilliantly is only a perfect wicketkeeper since every wicketkeeper is however expected to bat well, or at least averagely. Batting well, he's only doing his job.

Answer 3

An allrounder is someone who is good at all departments of cricket. Yes an excellent wicketkeeper batting brilliantly is an allrounder.

Answer 4

An all-rounder is the player who excels at both batting and bowling. Although all bowlers must bat, and most batsmen end up bowling occasionally, most players are skilled in only one of the two disciplines.

Wicket-keepers who are also very good batsmen (such as Adam Gilchrist) are considered by some to be all-rounders.

There is some confusion as to the precise definition that a player needs to fit in order to be considered an all-rounder. The generally accepted criterion is that a genuine all-rounder is someone whose batting or bowling skills, considered alone, would be good enough to win him a place in the team. By this definition, true all-rounders are quite rare, and extremely valuable to a team since they effectively count as two players.

One commonly used statistical rule of thumb is that the batting average of an all-rounder (the higher the better) should be greater than the bowling average (the lower the better).

Answer 5

there are two types of allrounders .
1 batting allrounder
2 bowling allrounder
3 anexcellent wicketkeeper batting brilliantly is not called as a allrounder

Answer 6

Id say genuine all rounder have a batting average over 30 and bowling average under 35.

Wicketkeeping and batting doesnt really count as an all rounder.

Answer 7

An all-rounder one who can bat and bowl according to the conditions.this is not required that he hits a big century in a match and in other one he gets out rapid.Yes,sure an excellent wicket-keeper (if he isa batting brilliantly )is a perfect all-rounder.

Answer 8

An allrounder is cricket is supposed to good in batting, fielding and bowling and if needed keep wickets also.

Answer 9

Wicketkeeper is given special considerations but they are usually not given the name as all rounder.*

The only all rounder in the cricket history may be Jimmy Adams of West Indies. He bowls, Bats, as well as keeps the wicket and also being a captain.*

Answer 10

All rounder is the one who will be able perform better in Batting and Boowling.

He will be able to find a place in the team as a batsman as well as a bowler.

He will be able to win the match for his country with his ability to bat and bowl.

It is clearly not someone who can do both, beacause many batsmen can bowl and are bowling as well as all the bowlers are asked to bat at the deadth.

One Good example is Kapil Dev.

You can not declare him as a batsmen or a bowler.

Answer 11

A allrounder is someone that is capable of batting, bowling and fielding.For e.g Sanath Jayasuriya
from sri lanka
over 130 catches
12,00 odi runs
& 296 wickets

wicket keepers never be a eye-catching allrounder.
definetely

if so sangakkara & mark boucher are
th best.all rounders

but no to your question