Hillary is not my first choice, but who liked her idea of "shared responsibility"?

Question

If you liked it, why?

If you didn't, why not?

Answer 1

I see everyone is talking about 'socialism'....another case of putting words into someones mouth. Nobody is suggesting any such a thing...not even a little bit. I guess that getting all over the things that the right wing talk show nitwits say she said is a way not to deal with the problems raised. If you use an expression of art like 'shared responsibility', somehow that translates to the government taking over the means of production and distribution a'la some kind of soviet system where all are equal but some are more equal than others. It's so predictible. These guys will twist any statement that anyone except their own pet politicians say into someting that its not. Now I know that some dim bulb will respond with, "Well, the 'leftists' do it too." Just another way to avoid dealing with the subject matter. The current GOP has royally screwed the pooch...no problem! But using the term 'shared responsibility' causes the 'wingers to break out in blisters. By the way..the term 'shared responsibility' is a figure of speech, not a communist policy. It means that co-operation is a virtue when dealing with the big questions and if we get it wrong all the people involve in the decision, including the 'Decider', have to share the fallout! Got a problem with that?

Answer 2

Hillary is a phony. She just wants everyone to share with her, but if she has to share, then she would change the rules real quick.
If anyone needs any evidence that the end of the World is around the corner one only needs to look as far as the people who swarm Bill Clinton as if he is a messiah and who praise the work he claims to have done as president. One only needs to know real history and not Clinton revisionism to understand that a whole generation of people are clueless and do not know what the truth is.
As is typical Clinton, he rewrote history and he managed to distort the truth in order to help Ms. Rodham Clinton, in order to woo the voters.
Clinton and Rodham are a greatly deceptive team who will ruin America even further if put back in the White House.

Answer 3

I just feel so warm and fuzzy thinking about sharing the responsibility for all the poor lovely people that manipulate the welfare system and live off the government while they sit in their section8 home/apartment that's twice the living space I have watching daytime crap TV on a 52" flat hi-def screen and they drive around in a luxury cars/suv's with wheels that cost more than my monthly food bill for a family of five. Just makes me want to give more to the government than they already take.

Hillary is so.... fluffy and downright authoritarian socialist.

Answer 4

No I hated that part! I hate it when she talks about sharing. In the context I am referring to, she wants to take wealth from those who have it (except for her wealth and that of her wealthy friends) and give it to others who are poor.

Trouble I have with that is that I spent 7 years going to university to get my college degree and then my graduate degree--and I worked full time the entire time while I attended university full time. Then I spent 9 years building my own business working my a.s.s. off doing so.

So she wants to take my money, to give to someone who refuses to improve their education or job skills?

Nope, Hillary is a commie in my book.

Answer 5

kick back; here's some music for you...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zMphc8tNrc&NR=1

think about it. Clinton - Obama in '08. They're the only logical choice the Dems have.

as for your question, this is pure socialism, it's true. about time.

The Democratic senator said what the Bush administration touts as an "ownership society" really is an "on your own" society that has widened the gap between rich and poor.

"I prefer a 'we're all in it together' society," she said. "I believe our government can once again work for all Americans. It can promote the great American tradition of opportunity for all and special privileges for none."


.

Answer 6

She talks out of her butt. She don't even believe what she says. She blames the war on Bush when she voted yes to go over in the first place. So the war is her fault as well as every one who voted yes to. You can't side step now that it hasn't worked out the way you wanted it to.

Answer 7

Nothing that Hillary says impresses me. She is merely 'marketing' and making promises she isn't going to back up, just like her proposed health care reform.

I know rattlers I trust more.

Answer 8

Gonna have to fill me in on what her idoa of "shared responsibility" is. Sounds like a socialist idea to me, and that in and of itself tells me it will not work long without corruption.

Answer 9

"Shared responsiblity" aka Communism. Been there before, I'll pass.

Answer 10

is that where she said this is george bush's war? no, wait, thats where she rejected her responsibility as a US senator who voted for his authorization to use military force.