why did paris cry like a baby on her way back to jail?

Answer 1

Maybe because she's 26 and never had to go to jail before


I think alot of 26 year old girls would be the same

Answer 2

Because all her plans failed to use her "get-out-jail-free cards". She's used to getting away with "murder" pretty much and all her fanaggling and scheming failed her. I think she is mostly pissed about that...that even her fail-proofs are not so resistant at all.

No one likes to go to jail but she's a wh*re and has been praised for what?? Being a wh*re? She has providing nothing of redemption for society, so why is she loved? She is totally immoral and bankrupt as far as a clean conscience is concerned. She thinks her money and fame can buy her anything.

She's nasty and there's no telling what type of infection she's got up inside her. Trailer trash keeps coming to mind.

She cried because her disrespect and failure to acknowledge that she is not above the law, failed her miserably today. Did you see the lines and lines of people just waiting to get into the courthouse to appear before the judge on random charges today? Yet Paris thinks she's above everyone else?

She's nothing but dirty flesh and I hope she falls on her fork in jail....w-trash she is...she's a nothing.

Answer 3

If I had to goto jail I might cry myself, im sure its nothing to look forward to. In her case im sure one part of her was scared to go back and the other was upset that money couldnt buy her out. She should receive the same punishment as anyone else, so I think this judge made the right choice and I think its the best for her

Answer 4

Paris HIlton is to be pitied but I am thrilled the judge followed thru. Poor Paris has never faced reality in her whole life and just skated by and her parents are as much to blame as her. She was horrified she actually had to pay for her missdeeds.."I am a star who me""" So this will hopefully be a wakeup call. Spoiled brat is reaping what she sowed.

Answer 5

Because she had to come to grip that daddy's money wasn't going to get har little spoiled azz out of doing time. She only got 45 days and she is crying, she should have thought about that before she got behind the wheel of a car drunk. It is times like this where I start to have faith in the justice system of Los Angeles.

Answer 6

I would be pretty upset too if I was set to jail twice, and my public carrer is in ruins. Luckily the judge threw the book at her again :)

Answer 7

What precisely is being criminalized? Not bad driving. Not destruction of property. Not the taking of human life or reckless endangerment. The crime is having the wrong substance in your blood. Crime : Blood-alcohol 0.08 percent and above

What have we done by permitting government to criminalize the content of our blood instead of actions themselves? We have given it power to make the application of the law arbitrary, capricious, and contingent on the judgment of cops and cop technicians. Indeed, without the government's "Breathalyzer," there is no way to tell for sure if we are breaking the law.
drunk driving has to be illegal because the probability of causing an accident rises dramatically when you drink ? The answer is just as simple: government in a free society should not deal in probabilities. The law should deal in actions and actions alone, and only insofar as they damage person or property. Probabilities are something for insurance companies to assess on a competitive and voluntary basis.
Despite the propaganda, what's being criminalized in the case of drunk driving is not the probability that a person driving will get into an accident but the fact of the blood-alcohol content itself. A drunk driver is humiliated and destroyed even when he hasn't done any harm. And please don't write me to say: "I am offended by your insensitivity because my mother was killed by a drunk driver." Any person responsible for killing someone else is guilty of manslaughter or murder and should be punished accordingly. But it is perverse to punish a murderer not because of his crime but because of some biological consideration, e.g. he has red hair.
In the same way, drunk drivers cause accidents but so do sober drivers, and many drunk drivers cause no accidents at all. The law should focus on violations of person and property, not scientific oddities like blood content.
There's a final point against Clinton's drunk-driving bill. It is a violation of states rights. Not only is there is no warrant in the Constitution for the federal government to legislate blood-alcohol content – the 10th amendment should prevent it from doing so.

Answer 8

Hey "god" maybe we should start driving with our eyes closed. It only increases the probability of an accident. What you are saying is really, really stupid. You are saying we should wait for someone to die before we do something about it. You should be shot, and hey, shooting people should be okay as it only increases the "probability" of death. I hope you get killed by a drunk driver you worthless peace of S H I T!!

Answer 9

She's a big whiny baby who's been pampered all her life and has gotten everything she's ever wanted. When reality hits the drama queen screams and cries. "Mommy! It's not fair!". Waa fkn waa.

Answer 10

I guess you like jail. Would you laugh your way back to jail?