...nop...not half as scared as hatfield.Author of ?
2007-06-08 17:27:00 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It will sink.
2007-06-08 17:32:15 · answer #1 · answered by K. Marx iii 5 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Yes. Maybe 2 carriers named Bush.
2007-06-09 00:29:29 · answer #2 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Nothing should be named after Bush as he is a poor excuse for a president
2007-06-09 10:26:52 · answer #3 · answered by xg6 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Imagine if you have Clinton on the side of aircraft carrier... It would look like a cigar carrier.
2007-06-09 00:36:32 · answer #4 · answered by DeadManWalking 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes for what that lady went through--"The Laura Bush"
2007-06-09 01:28:07 · answer #5 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Here Here from ye on forward all aircrafts shall carry the Bush name and you Liberal America haters can say Wah wah wah!! Hah! Love it!!!
2007-06-09 00:33:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
What is your question, exactly? If an aircraft should have the 'logo' of BUSH? There are many meanings to the word BUSH, and who gives.
2007-06-09 00:29:53 · answer #7 · answered by ☆Bombastic☆ 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Only if they are small, ineffective, and rudderless. That would sum up both President Bushs' leadership during their Presidency.
2007-06-09 01:00:21 · answer #8 · answered by Kevin k 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
After about a dozen have been named after Ronald Reagan, then yes, we should name some after both Georges.
2007-06-09 00:41:32 · answer #9 · answered by BRICK 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I wouldn't put Bush's name on a garbage barge.
2007-06-09 00:39:41 · answer #10 · answered by snackfairy06 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
No a Military Cowards name never will be applied to a proud military Unit! PERIOD!
2007-06-09 00:37:09 · answer #11 · answered by lifetimefamily 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋