English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Booking No.: 9818783 Last Name: HILTON First Name: PARIS Middle Name:
Sex: F Race: W Date Of Birth: 02/17/1981 Age: 26 Hair: BLN Eyes: GRN Height: 508 Weight: 115
Charge Level: M (Misdemeanor)

Case No.: 6MP0916001
Court Name: LOS ANGELES MUNI CT DIV 71
Court Address: 1945 S. HILL STREET Court City: LOS ANGELESUPT
Court Date: Sentence Date: 06/03/2007 Number of days Sentenced: 45
Disposition Code: SENT Disposition Description: CASE ADJUDICATED
Arrest Date: 06/03/2007 Arrest Time: 2315 Arrest Agency: 2101 Agency Description: LASD-CENTURY STATION PATROL
Date Booked: 06/03/2007 Time Booked: 2338 Booking Location: CEN Location Description: STA - CENTURY STATION
HOUSING LOCATION
Housing Location:
Facility: TWIN TOWERS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Address: 450 BAUCHET STREET City: LOS ANGELES
COURT
Next Court Code: M71 Next Court Date: 06/08/2007 Next Court Time: 0830 Next Court Case: 6MP09160RM
Court Name: LOS ANGELES MUNI CT DIV 71
Court Address: 1945 S. HILL STREET Court City: LOS ANGELESUPT
RELEASE
Projected Release Date: 06/26/2007

2007-06-08 16:10:28 · 16 answers · asked by Mister Bald 5 in News & Events Current Events

16 answers

Paris shouldn't be in that horrible place! I hope nothing bad happens to her in there. She didn't do anything to deserve being in jail! I hope that she gets out early because she shouldn't be back in there anyway. People are so jealous of her. She wouldn't be in jail if she wasn't rich and famous!

2007-06-08 16:26:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 8

Paris has committed a crime and she must do the time...why should she be any different than anyone else who commits a crime. Perhaps this will humble her a bit and make her realize that money, fame and all that rot doesn't not mean that you can be reckless, or endanger any other person without regard for the safety of those around her.
This is only jail, what if she had killed a child,or some childs parent? Her crying would be worse, or so I hope. This is not about her, its about the citizens who were minding their own business and living there lives as she drove recklessly and dangerously around them.
With all her money why not have a limo taking her around when she wants to party...therefore everyone is safe, she doesn't go to jail, and someone earns a living from her act of maturity.

2007-06-08 23:22:19 · answer #2 · answered by teri 4 · 6 0

What precisely is being criminalized? Not bad driving. Not destruction of property. Not the taking of human life or reckless endangerment. The crime is having the wrong substance in your blood. Crime : Blood-alcohol 0.08 percent and above

What have we done by permitting government to criminalize the content of our blood instead of actions themselves? We have given it power to make the application of the law arbitrary, capricious, and contingent on the judgment of cops and cop technicians. Indeed, without the government's "Breathalyzer," there is no way to tell for sure if we are breaking the law.
drunk driving has to be illegal because the probability of causing an accident rises dramatically when you drink ? The answer is just as simple: government in a free society should not deal in probabilities. The law should deal in actions and actions alone, and only insofar as they damage person or property. Probabilities are something for insurance companies to assess on a competitive and voluntary basis.
Despite the propaganda, what's being criminalized in the case of drunk driving is not the probability that a person driving will get into an accident but the fact of the blood-alcohol content itself. A drunk driver is humiliated and destroyed even when he hasn't done any harm. And please don't write me to say: "I am offended by your insensitivity because my mother was killed by a drunk driver." Any person responsible for killing someone else is guilty of manslaughter or murder and should be punished accordingly. But it is perverse to punish a murderer not because of his crime but because of some biological consideration, e.g. he has red hair.
In the same way, drunk drivers cause accidents but so do sober drivers, and many drunk drivers cause no accidents at all. The law should focus on violations of person and property, not scientific oddities like blood content.
There's a final point against Clinton's drunk-driving bill. It is a violation of states rights. Not only is there is no warrant in the Constitution for the federal government to legislate blood-alcohol content – the 10th amendment should prevent it from doing so.

2007-06-09 01:17:03 · answer #3 · answered by MIkE ALEGRIA 1 · 0 1

The most interesting theory I heard was that Paris Hilton was released as a precedent for the Presidential Pardon of Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Furthermore, I think Miss Hilton should get a real job.

2007-06-08 23:35:58 · answer #4 · answered by Erik Van Thienen 7 · 2 1

I think she needs to serve her full sentence. There was NO reason for her to violate her parole. She could even afford a driver if she really needed to go somewhere. I feel a little sorry for her because everyone is saying such hateful things about her--but she should be held to the same standards of behavior by the law.

2007-06-08 23:21:39 · answer #5 · answered by gastonkitty 3 · 3 0

no we r just saying that weather u rich or poor, do the crime then do the time, no wonder why shes not liked mate, not cause she is rich but cause she gets it her way, if she were in a world like us, the rich would not make it, they would b ****** lol and they hve to learn what the real world is about an understand that sometimes money cant help them, she should stay an pay the crime

2007-06-08 23:50:52 · answer #6 · answered by ? 2 · 1 0

The problem is that the judicial system in California appears to be administered by "The Three Stooges"

2007-06-09 09:55:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Paris Hilton should comply with the law and do the jail time as require by her sentence.

2007-06-08 23:33:16 · answer #8 · answered by tanasey 1 · 4 0

I think her behind should have never been released. You can't tell me strings were not pulled. She was just sent back to where she should have still been anyway.

2007-06-08 23:14:49 · answer #9 · answered by Angie B. 2 · 4 0

Uuuugh, enough already!!!!! You people are driving me nuts talking about this snob @$$ princess business fortune heiress b-tch... Eeeechhh

Maybe if she had kept her yeast infected t--- closed we wouldn't have to constantly hear about her airhead @$$

2007-06-08 23:51:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

why "poor paris?"

she committed a crime, was dished out terms for staying free. she violated those terms THREE times!!!! she was given a sentence, and she should do it.

PERIOD

2007-06-09 00:01:17 · answer #11 · answered by raynestorm73 4 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers