I agree with the posters above. I would add one caution: check out the state laws. In some states, a family can still buy their home back even after it has been sold as a foreclosure.
2007-06-08 16:41:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lacey G 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
It used to be the pro was that the bank would sell the house for cheap, for the amount of the loan, just to dump it. They don't want the liablility. The con is that now with the option arm loans, they loan may be as much as 115 percent of the original loan. Top that off with stabilizing or dropping market values such as CA and it's not such a good deal. Most bank now, option arm loan or not, want the market value out of a house or maybe 5 percent less and that's not always such a good deal. Plus, why was it foreclosed? Mortgagor could not make their payments. What other payments couldn't they make? Property taxes come to mind. You could end up with quite a bill. Other liens on the property will be your responsibility, so unless you have a way to search public records or get a preliminary title report, you could have a mess on your hands. Usually the house is sold site unseen and if that is the case. it may be a complete dump! If they didn't make their payment, they could have given up completely and just wrecked the house knowing the bank was going to get it. Or you could get lucky, get a good deal, put some money into and flip it for a decent profit.
2007-06-08 15:54:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Cat 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
You have to wait for and seek out your own financing. In most cases, they say you have to be approved (not to be confused with pre-approved because 'pre-approved' just means that you should be able to get a loan while 'approved' means that you are financed and have signed all the necessary papers and have the check in your hand. Also you may not have the time to have the house inspected so you are virtually buying it as is.
On the plus side, you can find some awesome properties through foreclosure and get them for less than market as most finance companies/banks just what the balance and any fees incurred.
2007-06-08 16:06:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Survivors Ready? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
for california - pro- lots to choose from...
con- you need the cash amount to buy the home ex: 400,000 home means at the the trustee's sale you need to have 400,000 + in cashiers checks
pro- high potential for making a lot of money
con- you need to do a lot of research to make sure there are no outrageous tax liens on the property because if you buy it and the liens don't get paid, guess what Uncle Sam does... yup not your home anymore so make sure you do a thorough title search on the home and try to see it before purchasing the home to see what major repairs need to be done...
pro- it's fun
con- sometimes if not careful it can consume you.
pro- $$$$$$$$
con- losing$$$$ if you don't know what your doing.
hope that helps
2007-06-08 17:52:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by jmilil 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
professional: it incredibly is less expensive than a classic inner maximum proprietor sale. I say would simply by fact in my section, those residences aren’t drastically extra low-cost. i bought one in Nov (no longer simply by fact i became searching for a foreclosure, yet simply by fact a foreclosed assets befell to be the living house), and because then I unquestionably have seen residences in my subdivision sell everywhere from 20% much less to twenty% better than I paid. We’re sitting desirable around universal for the section, yet our living house additionally didn’t want from now on paintings than may well be seen well-known for the section. professional: much less regularly, you could unquestionably get extra useful stuff than you will possibly in any different case. In my case, the previous proprietors looked as though it would have poured their fairness into living house maintenance & updates. So my living house befell to have approximately $20K worth of advancements that made it incredibly beautiful. Con: Banks tend to no longer prefer to negotiate. i'm a hundred% confident that if I didn’t have a brilliant client’s agent working for me, i does no longer have my living house. He lobbied the broking’s agent annoying to get what we mandatory carried out. Con: will probable be bought in as-is situation. Don’t assume the merchandising monetary enterprise to do any maintenance. and now and returned whilst the previous proprietors knew they had to pass away, the the two stopped looking after the living house and/or purposefully broken it. On that word, you incredibly would desire to make your grant contingent on inspection. basically keep in mind that if something isn’t connected (in my case, a skink, gasoline outdoors gentle & gasoline hearth), the inspector has no desirable to hook them as much as objective them and possibilities are high the monetary enterprise gained’t carry every person in to realize this so there may well be issues you could’t attempt in the previous you purchase.
2016-10-07 03:44:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You could get a potentially awesome house for a lot less. BUT you could also run into problems inregards to getting the financing or loan to close in a timley manner. I saw a friend wait for 4 months on the one she bought. So if you are not ina hurry, go for it. It takes a lot of patience.
2007-06-08 15:47:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by justhonest 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pro: you can get a bargain
Con: You take it "as is", no one is going to correct any defects you find out about, whether before or after Closing.
2007-06-08 15:48:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by open4one 7
·
0⤊
0⤋