Republicans keep blaming Clinton for everything. They will still be blaming him when Bush is finally trimmed.They seem to think it makes the Democrats look bad and the Republicans look good to blame Clinton for things he had no control over. It is pure stupidity and there are people out there that still believe Iraq attacked us on 9/11. I think you should have to take an intelligence test to vote.
2007-06-08 15:01:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by oldhag 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually the country was better under him when we had the towers attact under his watch he went after the ones who did it and concentrated on the USA by balanceing the budget.
They hated him because he was against big business and they wanted you to hate him. But the only thing they could do was trump up charges that were so false it was so obvious to anyone but a die hard Republican.
He wanted enviromental problems taken care of and attack him for a lie? Imagine that a Republican attacking someone for a lie? If the same rules applied this administration would be out the door. They called him corrupt and he couldn't hold a candle to this administration.
2007-06-08 21:51:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Steven 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Why would I get tired of it... It's not like he's a family member or someone I hold close to my heart.... If it bothers you then just don't read the questions or comments made about him!! Or seek counseling, He's just another politician.
2007-06-08 22:50:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Wyco 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
VERY!
Sedition is contemptible. Name-calling, rumor spreading, etc. are all forms of sedition. It's no longer illegal, but it sure is the opposite of patriotism. Some people don't know the difference between disagreement/dissent/protest (all of which can be done very patriotically) vs. sedition (which is NEVER patriotic).
Of couse, the same thing is being done today with President Bush. Do you speak up when that happens? Or do you stay silent and let such people represent you? That's what our silence does.
I spoke up then, I speak up now. How about you folks?
Oh, I'm a democrat (NOT a socialist, not a liberal).
2007-06-08 21:49:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
Speaking for myself, no. Why would people get tired of it? I'll venture that you will be attacking President Bush from now until you are 98 years old. That's just how it works.
2007-06-08 21:49:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
7 years from now they will be cursing and insulting Bush still also.
The price you pay for being big time.
2007-06-08 21:53:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by JPB 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I haven't seen any questions about Clinton for quite a while and even so the questions about Clinton are not nearly as hateful as the ones about Bush. BTW I don't even like Bush. I hate his illegal war and I hate his support of NAFTA, The North American Union and the SPP.
2007-06-08 21:49:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ethan M 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
No, history will prove that Clinton was one of our worst presidents.
2007-06-08 22:01:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by WOLFGANG 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, because I only attack him with the facts......and the fact is, he was a total screw up when he was in the white house.
2007-06-08 21:58:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe because they are scared of him coming back! This time in form of a first Lady and Ambassador...
2007-06-08 21:49:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋