English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

you would sound at least a little intelligent? Try something new. I know you guys aren't that......oh, who am I kidding?

2007-06-08 14:39:04 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

27 answers

Bush is an oil man and Hitler had gas chambers. Don't you get it?

2007-06-09 14:34:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I agree with the Mussolini comparison, for several reasons. In front of audiences, both puffed their chest out stiffly, and spoke unnaturally, while in contrast, Hitler was a spellbinding public speaker. Mussolini was as incompetent as Bush in warfare, and like Bush, he attacked defenseless little countries: Ethiopia and Albania. Hitler was TOO competent, and he fought France, England, the U.S., the USSR, and others, simultaneously. While Hitler had to rescue Il Duce, Hilary will have to rescue the country after Bush leaves.

2007-06-08 22:01:31 · answer #2 · answered by Who Else? 7 · 0 0

That's what Libs do when they're stumped and have nothing else. They tend to call names like the little wusses they are. One thing I've learned since being on YA is that libs are ever so predictable when it comes to the name calling.

Example:

"How can Hillary bad mouth the war when she indeed voted for the war and claimed Saddam was a threat...?"

Answer from a Lib: "Bush is a lying Chimp!"


Need I say more?

2007-06-08 22:09:02 · answer #3 · answered by ks 5 · 0 1

I think Bush to JFK would be a more valid comparison. Both presided over crisis involving a 'rogue state' with misles, both orchestrated invasions, both got the country embroiled in a hopeless mess of a foriegn war, both cut taxes (sorta), both got elected by capitalizing on a new trend in politics (for Kenedy, it was TV, for Bush, the religious right), both won by very close margins with some suspicion of voter fraud (Nixon, though, declined to press for recounts and investigations), both proposed moonshots.

Only problem with that one: Bush wasn't assassinated.

Unless you count character assassination.

2007-06-08 22:05:29 · answer #4 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0 1

Ok lets try this one. Is Hillary like Hitler?
"Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you. We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton - June 28, 2004, in San Francisco at a Democrat Party fundraiser)

"I want to take those profits and put them into an alternative energy fund that will begin to fund alternative smart energy alternatives that will actually begin to move us toward the direction of independence." (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton - February 2, 2007, at DNC Winter Meeting - regarding profits earned by oil companies, which are not [yet] owned by the government)

"As president I know I can't kill, jail or occupy every nation we don't agree with and I cannot just wish that all the terrorists be wiped off the face of the Earth" (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton - February 10, 2007, at a campaign appearance in New Hampshire)

"We're going to change the way we finance the system by taking away money from people who are doing well now" — (Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton — March 24, 2007, at a health care forum in Las Vegas)

2007-06-08 21:48:37 · answer #5 · answered by and socialism 4 · 1 3

Okay:
Bush is Stalin
Bush is Marx
Bush is Lenin
Bush is Mao Zedong

Better? More educated? Do I sound at least a little intelligent?

2007-06-08 21:48:21 · answer #6 · answered by David M 6 · 3 2

The people who post that crap show their true lack of intelligence. I don't even bother responding to it anymore.
How do you deal with someone who is either 4 years old or has a negative IQ.
Do they even teach History in school any more? My Dad fought against the likes of Hitler, and I wish these folks could have any comprehension of how idiotic they make themselves and their points look.
Just ignore them...

2007-06-08 21:48:01 · answer #7 · answered by Ken C 6 · 3 3

and how many times have I heard the "liberal/Hitler" comparison?

with even less grounds than the Bush comparison, if you ask me...

2007-06-08 21:54:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Bush isnt Hitler, Hitler was smart, a war veteran ,and a good speaker but also a crazed murderer. If i had to compare him to any past figure it would have to be El Duce.

2007-06-08 21:47:00 · answer #9 · answered by That One Dude 3 · 1 4

yeah, the hitler comparison is very disturbing. all that does is minimize what he and his nazi party did, it diminishes the evil of that ideology, and desensitizes people to the barbaric and cruel nature of that regime. those who make the bush/hitler comparison are either too stupid, too ignorant, or too partisan to see the world of difference between those two men, and can therefore be automatically dismissed... their opinion becomes irrelevant.

2007-06-08 21:52:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers