The judge ordered her back to jail to serve the entire 45 day sentence ! Thank God. It's about time that spoiled rotten little (rhymes with runt) couldn't buy her way out of yet another jam. She should consider herself lucky. If it were you or me, we'd get 6 months or more, and NOT be secluded from the general population "for our safety". I'd pay to see what the general inmates and dykes would do with her. I'm surprised Mommy & Daddy Hilton didn't just buy the prison so their little muffin wouldn't be all sad. Boo F-ing Hoo.
2007-06-08 14:25:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Within normal limitations, what one does in the privacy of their home is their business. However, what one does when operating a motor vehicle is the public’s business. Actually, the judge seems fairly lenient on her. I think the real issue is the way the sentencing is being so blown out of proportion. As if this woman is having imposed on her a hard and long prison sentence. The defense on the other hand is attempting to put the judge on trial, like he has ulterior motives, and wants to punish her because of who she is, and not because of what she did. The Sheriff is also onboard with this defense theory, following her transfer to home incarceration from fulltime custody. Her subsequent return to jail was after being summonsed back for a hearing, when the judge realized his orders were not complied with.
The Sheriff transferred her to home incarceration, without the apparent authority to implement this change in her incarceration status. The Sheriff is correct that many are released due to overcrowding, and this is in fact customary. But, I believe the Judge had a standing order for her to serve jail time. If this is true, the Sheriffs Department’s mission is to follow the direction of the Magistrate.
This “attacking the man” defense strategy thus sounds like nothing more then sour grapes, because she was in fact given probation, and made aware of the consequence if she violated her arrangement. So I think the judge was incredibly strong, and stood steadfast under enormous pressure. In the long run, if the poor woman is running amuck, then perhaps she will be better off by this experience. Since a lesson learned hard, is one that is learned well. This may be what she needs to mature, and realize the risk she was imposing on others.
I’m sure though the Sheriffs are very professional; she will be safe, and well treated.
2007-06-09 00:15:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by lrsrealty 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think 3 days is enuff sentencing for her, its probably all they got in the olden days was an overnight stay in jail.
I think she should be released immediately after the appeal.
Remember she got arrested coming from Charity events.
Folks sure are jealous of this gal.
2007-06-08 21:44:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by sunflare63 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes she did, but she also is appealing it, which is a very bad idea. She can complain all she wants, but she deserved the penatly she got. In fact her penalty should have been doubled.
2007-06-08 21:20:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by trey98607 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No all she has gotten is jealousy from public opinion
2007-06-08 21:19:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ibredd 7
·
0⤊
1⤋