I believe Sirhan Sirhan killed Bobby Kennedy and that he acted alone. Fired 8 bullets. 3 of them hit Mr. Kennedy.
I watched the "Conspiracy Test" program on the Discovery Channel. I'm sticking to the "Lone assassin" theory. I find it unlikely that there was a conspiracy and a cover-up going on.
2007-06-08 12:21:04 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
What I remember about RFK, not JFK, is that the main problem was determening just how far the bullets traveled. In truth, I wouldn't be surprised to discover that in that pandemonium in the hotel the officer's gun DID go off - however, it was by accident - and he just got away. We see cover ups and shifts of blame today, who's to say it wasn't that way back then? We just don't know.
2007-06-08 13:21:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good on you.
You must be one of the few who post a question on here who don't think everything is a conspiracy.
I believe in looking at the facts and making a judgemen from there. These would seem to support the lone gunman theory, so why complicate things with no valid reason to do so.
Occam's Razor anyone ?
2007-06-08 19:29:48 · answer #2 · answered by the_lipsiot 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The lone gunman theory is applied to JFK not RFK.
2007-06-08 19:28:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
this all happened when people were believing lone gunman stories. JFK, RFK, and MLK.
2007-06-08 22:02:22 · answer #4 · answered by Ibredd 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in america they have conspiracy theories for everything, it is good business.
2007-06-08 21:36:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You don't indicate any facts upon which you base your beliefs.
So is it just intuition?
2007-06-08 19:28:30 · answer #6 · answered by nora22000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋