both......
2007-06-08 13:22:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the way the law on dogfighting works it truly doesnt matter what role anyone involved has...they all end up with the same penalty. Even if Vick was never there to witness, bet or participate if he is proven to knowingly allowed the activity on his property he will face the same felony charges as anyone who gets charged. The fact that the feds jumped in on this one doesnt bode well for Vick...they normally have the cowboy mentality and will do anything they can to get a conviction. The only reason they pulled the rug from under the local authorities is they must have come up with some compelling evidence somewhere and will use the findings to trumpet themselves....it is the norm at the FBI level.
2007-06-08 19:57:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by viphockey4 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Per Virginia annotated code:
"§ 3.1-796.124. Dogfighting; penalty.
A. No person shall knowingly do any of the following:
1. Promote, engage in, or be employed in the fighting of dogs for amusement, sport or gain;
2. Wager money or anything of value on the result of such fighting;
3. Receive money or anything of value for the admission of another person to a place for dogfighting;
4. Possess, own, train, transport, or sell any dog with the intent that such dog engage in an exhibition of fighting with another dog; or
5. Permit any act described in subdivisions 1 through 4 of this subsection on any premises under his charge or control, or aid or abet any such act.
B. Any animal control officer, as defined in § 3.1-796.66, shall confiscate any dogs that have been, are, or are intended to be used in dogfighting and any equipment used in training such dogs or used in dogfighting.
C. Any person convicted of violating this section may be prohibited by the court from possession or ownership of other companion animals.
D. Any person who violates any provision of this section shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony.
E. In addition to any other fines and costs, any person who is convicted of a violation of this section shall pay all reasonable costs incurred in housing or euthanizing any confiscated dogs."
2007-06-08 19:51:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by JOSEPHLB 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
He is breeding dogs and allowing or forcing the dogs to fight... which he and others then bet on which dog will win...
And all his excuses and denials sound a lot like... "Uh, what had happened was... "
2007-06-08 19:28:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by hope this helps 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
allowing dogs to fight. It is basicly where people come to bet on which dog will win. It is very illegal.
2007-06-08 19:23:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dan 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
he's going to get it like a dog when they throw him in the pokey.
2007-06-08 19:25:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
he wont get charged they can't prove it
HAHAHAHAHAHA
mort
2007-06-08 19:34:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mortdesuper 3
·
0⤊
1⤋