Is education best left to local control or should this be renewed? What about the cost (money)? What should be changed?
2007-06-08 09:40:43 · 13 answers · asked by Jasmine 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
no it should not be,lets expose the liberal myth that all men,and women are created equally,we are not there are those that are book smart and those that are not,there are those that are common sense smart and those that are not there are those that mechanically smart and those that are not no child regardless of his/her ability's should be forced to accept an inferior education so as not to offend an inferior minded child or adult for that matter liberals seek to dumb down all children so as to better controll future Americans,sir teddy kennedy was charged with writing the nations education policy by Bush so libs do not try to pin blame on republicans!
2007-06-08 09:54:26 · answer #1 · answered by truckman 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes it should. The reports coming out show that the testing scores have been going up nationally each year. The teachers and administrators don't like it because they are now being held accountable. The Schools Superintendent here thinks that it is used as a scare tactic. Well it should be. If a teacher or a whole school is not competent to teach the kids why should they be able to keep their jobs. Because they are union?
2007-06-08 09:53:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
NCLB is for the kids. The local schools have proved too many times they cannot be trusted to educated the children. The only ones who are having a problem with this is the teachers and the Unions. They should enforce even tougher education laws.
2007-06-08 09:43:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
i'm able to in easy terms communicate some definitive issues approximately it. a million) not one of the academics that i understand ( and that i've got had 3 young infants interior the comparable college district for sixteen years and counting) like the barriers of NCLB. 2) so a techniques as i'm able to tell, no newborn gets left in the back of, yet no longer a heck of an incredible style of them are allowed to excel the two, as the two facets of the academic spectrum have been depleted. 3 ) i'm questioning no count number if NCLB has failed so miserably in California via colossal educational funds cuts, even on the collegiate point. i'm afraid that i've got give up attempting to alter issues, pdooma. and zorro.......... i'm afraid that my answer isn't all that exciting ! desire i could have placed on a extra appropriate tutor !!!
2016-11-07 23:57:43 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We wouldn't need it if grade teachers would just teach instead of giving kids tons of homework just for them to figure it out for themselves!
My grade teachers always pulled that crap but then i went to college where we get hardly any homework yet come the end of the semester i know everything because the college teachers actually teach. It seems like grade teachers are just too damn lazy and need a kick in the @ss like 'no child left behind' to figure out their job description... Teach kids academics and keep your political/moral ideas out of it!!!
2007-06-08 09:50:41 · answer #5 · answered by TJ815 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No child left behind has been very beneficial in large cities. Especially in closing schools that have failing students. it has also led to the increase of new schools. I think it needs be revised, but should stay.
2007-06-08 09:47:51 · answer #6 · answered by Toolegit 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. As much as I support teachers, this is the best thing that ever happened to education in my 50+ years. Hold the teachers accountable and listen to them whine. Its the kids that are at stake here.
2007-06-08 09:44:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
There is no way this should be renewed. It ruined education, the profession of teaching. All the teachers are doing is teching the kids how to take tests that had nothing to do with what they were teaching them.
2007-06-08 09:47:15 · answer #8 · answered by gone 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It should not be renewed. Schools are forced to not teach kids who want to learn and instead deal with the ones that don't, at least that is what it is like at my school. How much time does my counselor spend helping a kid failing half of his/her classes but when I want to duel enroll she barley does her job setting me aside as soon as possible and not giving me any assistance whatsoever. It is her job to help students but all she concentrates on are the ones who don't care. [The counselor in my school are in charge of scheduling]
2007-06-08 09:48:30 · answer #9 · answered by Mr. Knickerbocker 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
"President Bush knows students can succeed if they are using the best materials, proven lesson plans and textbooks aligned with state standards."
from www.ed.gov/nclb/methods/whatworks
That's funny considering he was a C student
2007-06-08 10:16:01 · answer #10 · answered by cjgt2 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋