I will be even happier when I stop hearing about Paris and her jail terms or anything about her.
I will be able to stop taking my wellbutrin when I never hear anymore about her at all!!!!!
Spoiled, talentless wh@r*s bring me down!
2007-06-08 11:51:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Within normal limitations, what one does in the privacy of their home is their business. However, what one does when operating a motor vehicle is the public’s business. Actually, the judge seems fairly lenient on her. I think the real issue is the way the sentencing is being so blown out of proportion. As if this woman is having imposed on her a hard and long prison sentence. The defense on the other hand is attempting to put the judge on trial, like he has ulterior motives, and wants to punish her because of who she is, and not because of what she did. The Sheriff is also onboard with this defense theory, following her transfer to home incarceration from fulltime custody. Her subsequent return to jail was after being summonsed back for a hearing, when the judge realized his orders were not complied with.
The Sheriff transferred her to home incarceration, without the apparent authority to implement this change in her incarceration status. The Sheriff is correct that many are released due to overcrowding, and this is in fact customary. But, I believe the Judge had a standing order for her to serve jail time. If this is true, the Sheriffs Department’s mission is to follow the direction of the Magistrate.
This “attacking the man” defense strategy thus sounds like nothing more then sour grapes, because she was in fact given probation, and made aware of the consequence if she violated her arrangement. So I think the judge was incredibly strong, and stood steadfast under enormous pressure. In the long run, if the poor woman is running amuck, then perhaps she will be better off by this experience. Since a lesson learned hard, is one that is learned well. This may be what she needs to mature, and realize the risk she was imposing on others.
I’m sure though the Sheriffs are very professional; she will be safe, and well treated. So, I'm not happy but I think it is just.
2007-06-09 00:22:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by lrsrealty 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Celebrity drama... Zzzzzzzzz
It's good that she's stuck dealing with jail the same way as everyone else. It's ridiculously bad for the image of the courts and law enforcement when people appear to get special treatment because of fame or money.
If we don't hear anything else about it until her 40 days are up, all the better!
2007-06-08 16:29:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Proto 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am happy because the judge was not moved by her money and celebrity, and although I doubt it, hopefully sent a message to the self-destructive, ignorant, self-important wannabes like Brittany Spears and Lindsay Lohan that they could land in jail if they continue down the spiral of drugs and irresponsibility.
2007-06-08 17:33:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by yp_apc_mar_vista 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I could care less what Paris does. However since i am forced to watch her All over the news I personally an=m glad to see her treated like the average Joe who had done the same thing all i have to say is HAHAHAHA
2007-06-08 16:27:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Cassie 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whether or not Paris is in jail has no effect on my happiness.
2007-06-08 16:25:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by mystery_me 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
It doesn`t really matter to me, but I know she feels uncomfortable, because the press and everyone is ALL IN her business about this whle "jail thing". I`m sure the press does not make this situation any better for her.
2007-06-08 16:32:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not happy, relieved that she finally gets to serve her sentence like anyone else. Maybe the next time she will not try to pull a fast one.
2007-06-08 17:05:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Karan 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I am happy that she went back...she didnt deserve to get out in the first place....she should serve her time,just like anyone else.....
2007-06-08 16:28:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Reda T 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, she needs to know that no one is above the law. I mean no one, including people of wealth, Money.
2007-06-08 16:23:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by That one 7
·
3⤊
0⤋