English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

how can anyone possibly believe anything HRC says when we all know what she "stole" from the sacred White House?
At some point, does "integrity" have to be called upon or have Americans given up on the need for this core value?
(this question is ONLY about Hillary!)

2007-06-08 08:51:18 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

11 answers

The hildabeast does not have any core values, her values
are POWER, and she could care less what anyone else
thinks.

2007-06-08 08:55:42 · answer #1 · answered by justgetitright 7 · 4 1

Remember they took away "The Ten Commandments" out of our courts.

So that when those that are in politics break the law us ignorant people will not remember what our "Core Values" are or what "integrity" means.

I am from the generation where they took GOD from schools,
It is that generation that stole hope and replaced it with corruption.

2007-06-09 00:40:52 · answer #2 · answered by Cheryl 5 · 2 0

"Liberalism is entirely based upon theft

Oh sure, they might use some fancy term like "wealth redistribution" but it means the same thing.

The street thug who points a gun at your chest and takes your wallet might also be said to be engaging in "wealth redistribution". You have money, he needs some, so he takes yours."

Not exactly, since the rich are exploiting the poor. Exploiting is another fancy term for stealing.

Redistribution of wealth would be more like dividing up stolen goods, since you don't know who had what.

2007-06-08 09:05:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

i think that the suited context of that commandment is homicide. of course, you will ought to kill somebody in self-protection. There are capital offenses in biblical regulation that required some form of execution, so interior the context of the full of scripture it could ought to be homicide. maximum Christians could ought to avert militia accountability because of the fact the strikes undertaken by means of them placed human beings interior the area of murderers. i could have a not elementary time killing all people i did not understand and wasn't offended with. How do militia human beings make the bounce from homicide to a justifiable killing? I had one communique with a militia person a protracted time in the past. I asked him: "So, how replaced into your day?" He stated: "Oh merely surprising. I merely have been given returned from bombing women human beings, infants, and civilians.." He replaced into touching on Kosovo and that i replaced into shocked by means of what he stated. It made me think of appropriate to the full concept of government. If i replaced into in his place, could i pass out an kill harmless human beings because of the fact the President ordered me to? So homicide is the unlawful killing of yet another guy, woman, or baby (fetus). as quickly as I say unlawful I advise that it breaks the commandment "Thou shalt not kill". So once you study something, you are able to tell the suited which ability by means of the context of the passage. If there are justifiable killings in biblical regulation, then the suited context it ability homicide.

2016-11-27 03:17:48 · answer #4 · answered by hosier 3 · 0 0

This is just another jealous Republican trying to start lies on the Great Hillary Clinton, You gotta be sick. What did George Bush steal 1. Our right to have our votes counted correctly, 2. Our freedom to our mail, phones . emails , etc. 3. Broke so many Constitutions that stole from our framers. 4 Stole from the poor and gave to the rich., etc . There is to many things that Chimpy and Al Capone have stolen , you know about all this missing Money, where do think that is hidden. Our troops right to live . just name it they stole it . What no good bunch of thieves ,stole the election to put them in the White House. Child molesters, Crooks just name they have put in their pockets , just a bunch of no good BAS****.

2007-06-08 09:58:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Dude.. I am sorry to say this but I don't believe Hillary has ever read/seen/looked at a bible. I am pretty sure she would catch fire if she touched one.

2007-06-08 10:41:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Huh? What is this that everyone is talking about? Hilary Clinton never talked about stealing anything. This sounds like yet another one of those made up things that Rush Limbaugh likes to talk about to rile people up.

2007-06-08 08:59:54 · answer #7 · answered by MrKnowItAll 6 · 1 3

Liberalism is entirely based upon theft

Oh sure, they might use some fancy term like "wealth redistribution" but it means the same thing.

The street thug who points a gun at your chest and takes your wallet might also be said to be engaging in "wealth redistribution". You have money, he needs some, so he takes yours.

2007-06-08 08:54:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6 3

If redistribution of wealth is a crime, you better lock away the wealthiest people in the country. They are getting paid more and more while the poor get poorer and the middle class fades away.

2007-06-08 08:59:46 · answer #9 · answered by J U 2 · 2 4

does not apply to government personal.

2007-06-08 11:05:50 · answer #10 · answered by thevillageidiotxxxx 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers