2007-06-08 08:10:29 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
We'd actually have an excess in the budget and be better able to help those who CAN'T work.
2007-06-08 08:13:43 · answer #1 · answered by Cherie 6 · 7⤊ 5⤋
-Obviously, they would have to get a job and work.
-We would have more money to help those who can't
-Economic boom
- Just like a wild animal that has been domesticated by human feeding, some would struggle with the concept of having to do for yourself, and perhaps turn to a life of drugs or crime. It's time to cull the herd anyway.
-Lower birth rate, now that the breeders have stopped using that to get benefits and as an excuse not to work.
-Rise in education level throughout the country, as more people decide finishing high school is a wiser choice now, and even attending college to find better gainful employment.
-More stable, better educated children that now have a better understanding that the American dream is not getting free food to fill a refrigerator in a unit in the projects.
-The rest of us who work will save more money from not having to babysit the bottom feeders.
- Many illegals would find out perhaps Mexico isn't so bad after all.
2007-06-08 08:30:39 · answer #2 · answered by Karma 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think i would be a bad thing.. this day and age.. if u arent blessed enough to have gone to college.. or had a foot into the door of a good coorporation.. u are screwed... with two parents working 2 full time jobs people still cant make it.. its sad but true.. as a family that works full time and still needs public assistance... i can tell u if they would just raise the wages to reflect apon the cost of living... we wouldnt need welfare... maybe medical... but thats about it.. its hard out there and people that are handed things or are blessed enough to have a great job dont understand..
older folks like to ***** about how hard they had it and they only made 1.00 an hour.. yeah but reflect on the prices of things then.. gas 10 cents a gallon??? food, shelter, all of the same things that we buy are now costing about what we get paid an hour... i mean i have to work 3 1/2 hours a day at work before i pay what it takes in gas EVERY DAY . so if i dont need milk or my daughter dont need anything then wow i worked 4 1/2 hrs to pay my rent ya ... that dont cover it..
i am sorry i am ranting its just people that are more fourtunate dont understand we have to say every penny... JUST to pay rent.. let alone live....
sorry that is all i have to say
2007-06-08 08:20:12 · answer #3 · answered by sayna_skylar02 1 · 4⤊ 2⤋
it extremely is achieveable yet no longer for human beings over sixty 5 or maybe over fifty 5. there are various styles of advantages paid in the process the social risk-free practices equipment, and a few could desire to be eradicated yet no longer retirement advantages. perhaps they're in basic terms streamlining their suggestions and dont desire as many place of work workers. There are too many federal workers besides. They dont do a great number of something, get beneficiant pensions and wellness care. that could desire to be ended. we can't save procuring non-efficient civil provider human beings.
2016-10-09 12:18:03 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually it was in 1996. That was the Welfare Reform Act that made workfare mandatory for welfare recipients who can work.
2007-06-08 12:45:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Corporate welfare,welfare to ungrateful foreigners who hate us,welfare to politicians,welfare to wealthy Hollywood actors and their causes,and the deportation of all illegals are bigger priorities for me.Get all of them off the dole and then you have a leg to stand on to complain about poor Americans trying to feed their families.Close the borders.Open borders is socialistic poop.Get mad about that.Don't ignore how we are giving up our sovereignty to socialism while you are too busy picking on poor Americans.If we have any money for Europe or the UN don't complain about poor Americans trying to eat.What would Jesus do?
2007-06-08 08:30:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
We could reduce the deficit, a bunch, and then there would be Americans to do the jobs the illegals are doing. What a concept, love it.
2007-06-08 11:02:37 · answer #7 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The lazy's would have to get up and go get a job or an education just like I am doing . Except I wouldn't be paying for them to sit on thier butts all day. I hope this happens soon...
2007-06-08 08:21:16 · answer #8 · answered by F123 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Wow! What a concept.
I believe liberals would find an alternative method of stealing our tax dollars.
2007-06-08 08:59:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm...a huge economic boom, because billions would not be taxed and could be reinvested into the free market.
Many people would also struggle to take care of themselves. The govn't has been mommy and daddy for them for so long the don't know how to be adults.
That would be a generational struggle, their children should realize what it takes to survive, and then could flourish if they wanted.
2007-06-08 08:17:16 · answer #10 · answered by gracilism 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Are you talking about corporate welfare? Farm subsidies?
2007-06-08 08:32:02 · answer #11 · answered by Franklin 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋