2007-06-08 06:15:10 · 15 answers · asked by softamoeba1 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Nor can they find felons, deadbeat dads, or keep track of child molestors......
Makes one go hmmmmm doesn't it!
2007-06-08 06:18:31 · answer #1 · answered by Susie D 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Maybe its because Bin Laden has not bin Sitting in the same space for 1,600 years and allowing ground penetrating radar to scan what lies beneath his turban.
Maybe Bin Laden body mass is not as wide as thousands square kilometers that a present day satellite can see him from way up there.
2007-06-08 13:32:44 · answer #2 · answered by Shakabula 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're right! Last time I looked Bin Laden was easily the size of an ancient Egyptian city and since he's painted bright orange we ought to be able to spot him from Mars!
2007-06-09 05:38:57 · answer #3 · answered by last_errant_knight 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We know where he is - along the Pakistan / Afghanistan border. The problem is that people are either paid to look the other way or are devout followers.
If we didn't start up in Iraq, the United States would have gotten the person responsible for 3,000 killed on U.S. soil and crushed Al-Quaeda.
Unfortunately, we have lost face going into Iraq and emboldened people to join Al-Quaeda.
2007-06-08 13:23:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The 1600 year old Egyptian city wasn't found in some pig farmers mud brick barn in the hills of pakistan either.
2007-06-08 13:21:42 · answer #5 · answered by Army Retired Guy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are absolutely right. Do you want a medal? Are you saying the government is dumb or holding back on finding this one man? For starters, is it easier to find something as big as a city or as small as a man? Is it easier to find something that stays in one spot or can circumnaviate the globe? Is it easier to find something that could care less about being found or something that is actively taking measures to be hidden? Common sense, Joe.
2007-06-08 13:19:25 · answer #6 · answered by David 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Cities ARE bigger than people and he looks like every other crazy Muslim terrorist hiding in a cave! Clinton didn't have any trouble finding him, at least 4 times, but didn't bother to take care of him.
2007-06-08 13:18:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
''We,'' as in the US can not find bin Laden because we are not looking for him. The CIA and FBI have removed him from their 9/11 page, apparently because of a ''lack of evidence.'' hmm.....
2007-06-08 13:18:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the diffrence is that this cities haven't moved for thousands of years, while bin laden HAS
2007-06-08 13:18:47 · answer #9 · answered by Me 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Are you on crack?
This is like saying "I can see the goodyear blimp but can't find that fly buzzing around."
2007-06-08 13:22:42 · answer #10 · answered by futurefbiguy 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We (meaning the current administration) have no intention of catching bin laden. He would have been found if he was supposed to be found. Bush declared him "wanted dead or alive" and then claims that he's not that important. WTF?
2007-06-08 13:21:24 · answer #11 · answered by katydid 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋